[Moderator: By default, with AT&T and incidents like this I full agree. The people citing this as a hacker attack mentioned the 1990 switch crash (due to faulty upgrade software) and realize the details behind that story.] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Jay D. Dyson" <jdysont_private> To: jerichot_private Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 14:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [ISN] AT&T Data Networks Down (hacker?) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > TECH. 5:01 am > AT&T DATA NETWORKS DOWN FOR THE COUNT > An unidentified problem takes down AT&T's frame relay and ATM > data networks. I'm not inclined to think it's a hack. Remember the massive January 1990 phone system failure that AT&T experienced a few years ago? That one instantly raised the "hacker flag" and shortly afterward, we had feds going all over the place trying to bust hackers. I'm entirely inclined to cite AT&T incompetence for this one. There's already a history that points toward as much. I don't think this situation is any different. They likely upgraded their code and didn't debug it thoroughly, just like _last_ time. ( .--- "There's always time for a good cup of coffee" ---. ______ )) | Jay D. Dyson, ICIS - jdysont_private | >===<--. C|~~| | CF BA 5A 67 89 83 67 A7 CA E0 D9 C0 1A 19 8E 58 | | = |-' `--' `---------------- Nemo impune lacessit ----------------' `-----' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNTPZeOe1NzV7EsRFAQE7hgP6AxG6ULB5n16ajCkqNEm33dlnk1/qH12g Tcy9LDRlatKoYD9y74uksTe1sQbNJ56JyybuVU97iHGkwXGZyPwW0ZwywIJ/wQtt tHXHyf6tfvV9jYqF8nD8z8nhHxARgwvXmWdeQxcnTxWxudn8oMja93tmE4GdNei9 P5LJraq/cDE= =+Qzd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -o- Subscribe: mail majordomot_private with "subscribe isn". Today's ISN Sponsor: Dimensional Communications (www.dim.com)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:50:40 PDT