[ISN] U.S. Agency Cracks Down on Internet Information Brokers

From: cult hero (jerichoat_private)
Date: Fri Apr 23 1999 - 13:43:23 PDT

  • Next message: cult hero: "[ISN] 45% of big firms monitor workers"

    http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/04/biztech/articles/23privacy.html
    April 23, 1999
    By STEPHEN LABATON
    
    U.S. Agency Cracks Down on Internet Investigators
    Web Sites of Information Brokers Proliferate
    
    WASHINGTON -- The Federal Government Thursday began cracking down on the
    deceptive practices of a proliferating number of private investigators who
    advertise on the Internet that they can inexpensively provide confidential
    details about bank accounts and telephone records. 
    
    In the first civil case of its kind, lawyers at the Federal Trade
    Commission accused a Colorado couple of violating the law by posing as
    bank customers to trick banks into providing confidential information. The
    couple, James and Regana Rapp, had advertised on their Web site that their
    company, Touch Tone Information Inc., could obtain bank records,
    unpublished telephone numbers and financial assets. 
    
    Government officials said Touch Tone Information, one of scores of
    investigative agencies that glean confidential information under false
    pretenses, had employees make hundreds of telephone calls in which they
    falsely claimed to be either a bank customer or relative. The Federal
    Trade Commission Act makes it illegal to use such deceptive trade
    practices. 
    
    Rapp acknowledged in an interview today that he and his employees had
    tricked many banks and other institutions into providing confidential
    information. Touch Tone's Internet site advertised that for $100 it could
    obtain information within 10 days about a bank account -- $200 for a stock
    account. It also said it could obtain telephone toll records and unlisted
    numbers and addresses. 
    
    Rapp said that as a result of the lawsuit, he had removed his Web site and
    would stop the practice of posing as a customer of the institution that he
    was trying to get information from. He said that the trade commission's
    action would curtail only a small part of his investigations business and
    complained that it would only hurt victims -- clients like mothers seeking
    payments from dead-beat fathers and other government agencies that he said
    had employed him to track down assets. 
    
    "If you're a dead-beat dad or a neglected spouse," Rapp said, "you don't
    have to worry anymore." 
    
    Commercial Web sites run by private investigators have flourished in
    recent years, advertising the ability to find a wide array of public and
    confidential information -- like telephone records and credit and bank
    accounts -- for lawyers, spurned spouses and burned business partners.
    Some of the information they sell is available in public records, but
    other information can only be obtained by deception or bribery, privacy
    experts say. Although law-enforcement officials in some states like
    Connecticut and Massachusetts have prosecuted investigators who illegally
    obtain information by pretending to be either a bank customer or relative,
    the Federal Government has moved more slowly. 
    
    Many privacy experts say that as long as law firms and big businesses are
    largely insulated from Government prosecution because the laws are
    narrowly written, the deceptive practices of investigators like the Rapps
    will never be curtailed. 
    
    "The F.T.C. cannot stop this practice because there is a lot of value for
    this data, and people will continue to pay for it," said Evan Hendricks,
    editor of Privacy Times, a Washington news letter that covers privacy
    issues. 
    
    But officials at the Federal Trade Commission said the case was filed as a
    warning to both the information brokerage industry and the bigger fish,
    the firms that retain the investigators. 
    
    "We want to send a message to others that this kind of deception and
    invasion of privacy is unacceptable," said Robert Pitofsky, chairman of
    the commission. 
    
    Today's lawsuit is part of a broader policy agenda promoted by Pitofsky to
    address privacy issues and the Internet. Earlier this week, the commission
    announced a proposal for new rules intended to protect the privacy
    interests of children on the Internet by generally requiring operators of
    Web sites to obtain parental consent before soliciting information from
    children under 13. 
    
    The agency has asked Congress for the authority to seek civil penalties
    against brokers who obtain sensitive financial information about
    individuals under false pretenses. In its case brought today, the agency
    sought forfeiture of Touch Tone's profits and an injunction against any
    future deceptive practices by the company. 
    
    Representative Jim Leach, the Iowa Republican who heads the House banking
    committee, recently introduced legislation that would make it a crime to
    knowingly deceive a financial information to obtain confidential
    information. But the proposal would also raise the burden of proof for
    civil cases, which has created some concern at the Federal Trade
    Commission. 
    
    Officials at the Justice Department have said they believe they implicitly
    have authority to make criminal cases under Federal wire fraud laws. 
    
    Still, the laws on the issue are far from clear. 
    
    Orson Swindle, a member of the Federal Trade Commission, dissented from
    the agency's decision to file a lawsuit against Touch Tone on the ground
    that he did not think the Federal Trade Commission Act or the agency's
    guidelines on the law prohibited the Rapps' conduct. 
    
    -o-
    Subscribe: mail majordomoat_private with "subscribe isn".
    Today's ISN Sponsor: Hacker News Network [www.hackernews.com]
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:22:42 PDT