http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,73922,00.html By DAN VERTON SEPTEMBER 02, 2002 Washington As the White House last week began putting the final touches on its long-awaited National Plan for Protecting Cyberspace, administration officials took issue with a press report that suggested the plan would include provisions to expand the government's data collection and surveillance. The plan, which is scheduled to be released Sept. 18 during a ceremony at Stanford University, does include a provision to build a cybersecurity network operations center. However, a published report suggesting that the NOC would collect and examine e-mail and data traffic from major Internet service providers and other private-sector companies is misleading and inaccurate, said Tiffany Olson, an assistant to Richard Clarke, chairman of the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board and the principal force behind the strategy. Olson said the published report is necessarily inaccurate because the plan hasn't even been finished. "There were many initial drafts, and many organizations provided input," she said. "But we've just started to finalize it this week." The concept of developing a federal NOC is definitely in the strategy, but not with the aim of gathering e-mail data or expanding government surveillance, Olson said. Rather, the federal NOC would be modeled after the Bethesda, Md.-based SANS Institute's Incidents.org Web site and Internet Storm Center, a virtual organization of advanced intrusion-detection analysts, forensics experts and incident handlers from across the globe. Howard Schmidt, co-chairman of the Critical Infrastructure Protection Board, told Computerworld last week that the plan is to simply ask for greater voluntary data sharing on matters such as viruses and worms. He also stressed that establishing a central NOC isn't part of a plan to increase the government's surveillance of private data. Schmidt said the need for a central government NOC stems from the lack of a single collection point where government security can be analyzed. This central NOC would collect data from other government NOCs, such as the FBI's National Infrastructure Protection Center and the Pentagon's Joint Task Force for Computer Network Defense. These NOCs, in turn, would function in a fashion similar to the private sector's Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ISAC) - alliances formed within vertical industries to improve information sharing about security vulnerabilities and threats. The SANS Storm Center uses advanced data correlation and visualization techniques to analyze data collected from more than 3,000 firewalls and intrusion-detection systems in more than 60 countries. "We're hoping the [ISACs] one day establish their own independent Storm Center network," said Alan Paller, director of the SANS Institute. And that may be much easier to do now that Redwood City, Calif.-based Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., which operates more than 63% of all firewalls worldwide, is adding a Storm Center client in every one of its 260,000 gateways, said Paller. "That means anyone who wants to set up a Storm Center network can just tell their members to turn on the client and point it to their network node," he said. A Work in Progress Although "sworn to secrecy" about the specific contents of the administration's plan, Harris Miller, president of the Arlington, Va.-based Information Technology Association of America, said last week that the plan remained "in a state of flux" and that any information made public to date "may or may not still be in the document when it is released." The Bush administration also plans to release a revision of the forthcoming plan as early as January, Schmidt said during a recent press briefing at the White House. The revision will include details on "definitive programs," he said. In addition, plans call for another seven town hall meetings to be held around the country after the Sept. 18 release, to gather more feedback from both the private sector and the general public, he said. Officials underscored the voluntary nature of the public/ private partnership, noting that the White House isn't legally capable of forcing any sort of data-sharing agreements on the private sector. What the government can and plans to do, however, is "create government as a model," said Schmidt. In an interview with Computerworld last month, Clarke said the plan may include a governmentwide policy that requires all IT purchases to be independently certified for security prior to approval. Such a policy, which is currently in effect at the Defense Department, was being "looked at carefully," but at that point no decision had been made, he said. - ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org To unsubscribe email majordomoat_private with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 04 2002 - 02:07:11 PDT