Forwarded from: "Moyer, Shawn" <SMoyerat_private> Cc: "'jrpat_private'" <jrpat_private> J.R. Parkinson spake in http://www.jsonline.com/bym/career/oct02/85638.asp : > Our national mind-set is what makes mail secure. The same should be > true for information on a computer. Just because it's possible to > get at electronic information doesn't give anyone the license to do > it any more than being able to open someone's mailbox gives anyone > permission to do that. Umm... Actually, I don't trust the U.S. mail one bit for any kind of secured communication, any more than I would trust a poorly-secured website to honor my privacy or keep my credit card secure. For secure mail, you use a bonded and insured courier service who maintains a covenant of securing data and respecting the privacy of the sender and recipient. For secured web transactions, you vote with your wallet for companies who have a history of diligence and vigilance in regard to web security. As to locks on mailboxes, you seem to have a rather idyllic view of the world. Anyone who values their privacy would be wise to purchase one of these: http://hectorshardware.com/locsecmailex.html > Society would never tolerate a "United States mail hacker," and > there is no reason to tolerate a computer hacker. We don't tolerate computer intruders who steal data or damage systems, nor do we tolerate people who rifle through private mail. The sad truth, kind sir, is that both of these happen on a daily basis, both are reprehensible, and both are preventable with a bit of due care and the proper security measures. The real shame is that so many people, even today, are shocked at what a Big Scary World it is out there, and at what the Big Scary People will do. Arm yourself, lock your doors, lock your mailbox, firewall and patch your webserver. Otherwise, you will eventually be in for a rather rude awakening. I've had my home burglarized twice, and have dealt with a number of system intrusions in the computer arena. In none of those situations did I consider myself a poor victim of malicious "hackers", but rather a victim of excessive trust if not downright negligence. > Clear and accurate communication is essential for business to be > successful. In a past column, I quoted my first-grade teacher, who > often said, "Say what you mean, and mean what you say." That's deep. Really, it is. I would add this from ol' Sam Clemens: "Better to close one's mouth and be thought a fool than to open it and remove any doubt." > I don't think she would ever use the light-hearted word "hacker" for > such a serious activity. She would have a much stronger word. > Perhaps all of us in business should use equally strong and clear > language, and place the responsibility or blame where it belongs. For a stronger word, why not use the right one? Cracker. http://tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/cracker.html Note the difference for future reference. http://tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/hacker.html - ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org To unsubscribe email majordomoat_private with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Oct 08 2002 - 02:52:14 PDT