[ISN] Hooray for TIA

From: InfoSec News (isnat_private)
Date: Fri Dec 20 2002 - 02:03:06 PST

  • Next message: InfoSec News: "[ISN] No One at Home"

    Forwarded from: security curmudgeon <jerichoat_private>
    From: Nomen Nescio <nobodyat_private>
    Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
    	It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
    	Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
    	remailer administrator at <abuseat_private>.
    To: cypherpunksat_private
    Subject: Hooray for TIA
    For years we cypherpunks have been telling you people that you are
    responsible for protecting your own privacy.  Use cash for purchases, look
    into offshore accounts, protect your online privacy with cryptography and
    anonymizing proxies.  But did you listen?  No.  You thought to trust the
    government.  You believed in transparency.  You passed laws, for Freedom
    of Information, and Protection of Privacy, and Insurance Accountability,
    and Fair Lending Practices.
    And now the government has turned against you.  It's Total Information
    Awareness program is being set up to collect data from every database
    possible.  Medical records, financial data, favorite web sites and email
    addresses, all will be brought together into a centralized office where
    every detail can be studied in order to build a profile about you. All
    those laws you passed, those government regulations, are being bypassed,
    ignored, flushed away, all in the name of National Security.
    Well, we fucking told you so.
    And don't try blaming the people in charge.  You liberals are cursing
    Bush, and Ashcroft, and Poindexter.  These laws were passed by the entire
    U.S. Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike.  Representatives have the
    full support of the American people; most were re-elected with large
    margins.  It's not Bush and company who are at fault, it's the whole idea
    that you can trust government to protect your privacy.
    All that data out there has been begging to be used.  It was only a matter
    of time.
    And you know what?  It's good that this has happened.  Not only has it
    shown the intellectual bankruptcy of trust-the-government privacy
    advocates, it proves what cypherpunks have been saying all along, that
    people must protect their own privacy.  The only way to keep your privacy
    safe is to keep the data from getting out there in the first place.
    Cypherpunks have consistently promoted two seemingly contradictory ideas.
    The first is that people should protect data about themselves. The second
    is that they should have full access and usability for data they acquire
    about others.  Cypherpunks have supported ideas like Blacknet, and
    offshore data havens, places where data could be collected, consolidated
    and sold irrespective of government regulations.  The same encryption
    technologies which help people protect their privacy can be used to bypass
    attempts by government to control the flow of data.
    This two-pronged approach to the problem produces a sort of Darwinian
    competition between privacy protectors and data collectors.  It's not
    unlike the competition between code makers and code breakers, which has
    led to amazing enhancements in cryptography technology over the past few
    decades.  There is every reason to expect that a similar level of
    improvement and innovation can and will eventually develop in privacy
    protection and data management as these technologies continue to be
    But in the mean time, three cheers for TIA.  It's too bad that it's the
    government doing it rather than a shadowy offshore agency with virtual
    tentacles into the net, but the point is being made all the same. Now more
    than ever, people need privacy technology.  Government is not the answer.
    It's time to start protecting ourselves, because nobody else is going to
    do it for us.
    ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org
    To unsubscribe email majordomoat_private with 'unsubscribe isn'
    in the BODY of the mail.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Dec 20 2002 - 20:08:08 PST