[ISN] Feds Mull IT Disclosure

From: InfoSec News (isnat_private)
Date: Tue Apr 15 2003 - 02:05:36 PDT

  • Next message: InfoSec News: "[ISN] Aussie court crackers on crackers"

    http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1022906,00.asp
    
    By Caron Carlson
    April 14, 2003 
    
    Momentum is building in Washington to require all public companies to
    annually report the performance of their IT security initiatives, not
    just the financial services and health care industries that face
    scrutiny now.
    
    The Bush administration considered requiring companies to report on
    network security during the crafting of the National Strategy to
    Secure Cyberspace. But the idea was unpopular in many enterprises and
    did not make the final plan, released in February.
    
    Last week, former presidential adviser for cyberspace Richard Clarke,
    who spearheaded the strategy, urged Congress to act quickly to
    legislate such obligations.
    
    Enterprises object to the suggestion of broad reporting requirements,
    but some see a certified audit process reflected in annual Securities
    and Exchange Commission filings as beneficial.
    
    "I think IT will begin taking on the same relative importance that
    finance and accounting has within a company," said Michael Schwedhelm,
    senior vice president and CIO of Union Labor Bank, in Oakland, Calif.  
    "What I see happening is something along the lines of CPAs for network
    security."
    
    The financial services and health care industries, which are already
    subject to network security disclosures, would face the least added
    burden. Possible requirements include disclosing measures taken to
    secure systems, identifying IT security auditors and detailing
    breaches.
    
    U.S. Rep. Adam Putnam, R-Fla., who chairs the House Government Reform
    subcommittee on technology and information policy, told eWeek last
    week that legislative action to improve the nation's IT infrastructure
    is needed this year.
    
    A bill has not yet been drafted, Putnam said, but members of the
    subcommittee are considering several recommendations by IT experts,
    including performance audits that would be reported in SEC filings.
    
    Whether companies should disclose specific security breaches remains a
    subject of wide debate even among proponents of new reporting
    requirements. Some states have begun taking action on their own. In
    California, a law set to take effect in July will require companies to
    report network breaches if sensitive customer data may have been
    accessed.
    
    If incident reporting is to be required, a nationwide policy would be
    preferable to diverse state-by-state requirements, said Schwedhelm,
    who is also an eWeek Corporate Partner.
    
    "While [the California requirement] may be achievable by companies
    that only do business in California, it will be a nightmare if each
    individual state has its own set of criteria," he said.
    
    
    
    -
    ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org
    
    To unsubscribe email majordomoat_private with 'unsubscribe isn'
    in the BODY of the mail.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 18:05:25 PDT