[ISN] MS mulls external testing for security patches

From: InfoSec News (isnat_private)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 01:00:32 PDT

  • Next message: InfoSec News: "[ISN] Security UPDATE, April 30, 2003"

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/30464.html
    
    By John Leyden
    Posted: 30/04/2003
    
    Microsoft is considering an external testing programme to improve the
    quality of its security patches.
    
    Difficulty in applying patches and instances where fixes fail to work
    properly - or cause unfortunate side effects - have long been an issue
    in Microsoft shops.
    
    Craig Fiebig, general manager of the Secure Business Unit at
    Microsoft, acknowledges this is an issue and outlined some of the
    steps Microsoft is taking to address the problem in the next phase of
    its Trustworthy Computing push.
    
    "We need to think of the release of a patch in the same way we would
    the release of a product. There needs to be broader testing," Fiebig
    said, at the Infosecurity conference in London yesterday.
    
    Particularly when vulnerabilities are actively been exploited,
    software vendors are under pressure to release fixes quickly - and
    this works against comprehensive testing.
    
    Fiebig concedes this point and said Microsoft "had to be mindful" of
    the quality impact of the patches it produced.
    
    "There's a trade off and we need to be careful how we do this. Once a
    vulnerability comes to light the clock starts ticking," he said.
    
    "First you have to apply a triage system, to access the impact of a
    vulnerability. You need to produce a patch and then test it. Greater
    testing needs to take place. Microsoft is considering introducing
    external testing with key customers."
    
    Trustworthy Computing - next steps
    
    Fiebel's comments reinforce a presentation by Mike Nash, MS corporate
    security veep, at the RSA Conference in California this month (see
    story) [1].
    
    Security tax
    
    Microsoft is working towards lowering the total cost of ownership for
    achieving secure systems, Fiebel said:  "Users shouldn't be taxed for
    achieving security."
    
    Microsoft can reduce security overheads by making sure products ship
    with fewer vulnerabilities, simplifying patch management and reducing
    the amount of downtime needed to apply security fixes. This focus on
    security will not come at the expense of that favourits MS buzz-word -
    innovation - Fiebig claims.
    
    "There will still be innovation, but we have to think about what the
    impact will be in terms of security. Security applies to everything we
    do at Microsoft: from recruitment and training to what we do with our
    products," he said.
    
    For those who doubt Microsoft will ever get close to producing secure
    products, Fiebig points to Microsoft's success in redesigning its core
    products for the Internet.
    
    Making its infamously flaky code secure is a much bigger challenge for
    Microsoft, but there are signs it is making real progress on this
    front, even though it has a long way to go.
    
    With Windows Server 2003, Microsoft is beginning to apply secure by
    default, by design and deployment ideas. These, together with a
    re-architecture of IIS, will, hopefully, guard against repetition of
    the Nimda-style outbreaks, on Windows 2003 boxes, at least. According
    to Fiebig, by default Windows Server 2003 exposes 60 per cent less
    surface area to attack than NT4 SP3.
    
    "If attacked a system will fail gracefully, rather than falling over,"  
    he said.
    
    Microsoft also wants to make it easier for developers to build secure
    applications.
    
    Visual Studio .NET 2003 includes improved tools to capture buffer
    overflows, that perennial source of security vulnerabilities, during
    build and run-time.
    
    We're sceptical about the chances that this will get anywhere close to
    reducing security-related programming errors to zero, as Microsoft
    hopes, but once again this is a step in the right direction.
    
    To simplify security management and operations for its customers,
    Microsoft will reduce the number of patch installer technologies used
    across the company and offer new security configuration wizards.  
    Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer 1.2, due later this year, is
    designed to make it easier for users to identify unpatched systems.
    
    For IT admins, Microsoft Software Update Services (SUS) and Systems
    Management Server 2.0 Software Update Feature Pack 1 currently help
    automate patch installation for the Windows platform.
    
    Later this year, Microsoft will release SUS 2.0, which will include
    update functionality for a broader set of Microsoft products. Later
    this year, Microsoft will release Systems Management Server 2003,
    which will include features such as the ability to automatically
    install patches during scheduled downtime.
    
    [1] http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/30261.html
    
    
    
    -
    ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org
    
    To unsubscribe email majordomoat_private with 'unsubscribe isn'
    in the BODY of the mail.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 01 2003 - 03:11:25 PDT