Forwarded from: Russell Coker <russellat_private> On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 17:28, InfoSec News wrote: > "Some pointed out that this is a violation of individuals' rights to > purchase and own camera phones, but the concern about possible leakage > of core technologies is so great that we have decided to ban camera > phones in the workplace," a Samsung executive said. How is that a violation of people's rights? Surely it's quite normal and reasonable for a company to have a list of activities that are not work related which may not be performed in their offices. Company regulations affect how you may dress, what you may do in your lunch break, and many topics of conversation are banned as they may cause offense to other workers. If someone has a personal (non-company) mobile phone that they want to use during office hours then insisting that it be an approved model does not seem to be a great burden. If I was employed by Samsung I would want to get a special deal on one of their mobile phones, but it wouldn't bother me if I was forced to use my old non-camera phone while at work. Changing a SIM between phones is easy enough. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page - ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org To unsubscribe email majordomoat_private with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jul 09 2003 - 06:23:45 PDT