Forwarded from: Henry Schwan <owlswan@private> An important question to be asked is if all the other electronic machines that Diebold and others make leave a paper trail, why was the paper trail in voting machines specifically left out. See: No Confidence Vote: Why the Current Touch Screen Voting Fiasco Was Pretty Much Inevitable <http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20031204.html> -----snip---- Now here's the really interesting part. Forgetting for a moment Diebold's voting machines, let's look at the other equipment they make. Diebold makes a lot of ATM machines. They make machines that sell tickets for trains and subways. They make store checkout scanners, including self-service scanners. They make machines that allow access to buildings for people with magnetic cards. They make machines that use magnetic cards for payment in closed systems like university dining rooms. All of these are machines that involve data input that results in a transaction, just like a voting machine. But unlike a voting machine, every one of these other kinds of Diebold machines -- EVERY ONE -- creates a paper trail and can be audited. Would Citibank have it any other way? Would Home Depot? Would the CIA? Of course not. These machines affect the livelihood of their owners. If they can't be audited they can't be trusted. If they can't be trusted they won't be used. Now back to those voting machines. If EVERY OTHER kind of machine you make includes an auditable paper trail, wouldn't it seem logical to include such a capability in the voting machines, too? Given that what you are doing is adapting existing technology to a new purpose, wouldn't it be logical to carry over to voting machines this capability that is so important in every other kind of transaction device? This confuses me. I'd love to know who said to leave the feature out and why? Next week: the answer. InfoSec News wrote: > http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A47436-2003Dec8.html > > By Jonathan Krim > Washington Post Staff Writer > December 9, 2003 > > Electronic-voting-machine companies announced yesterday that they > are banding together to counter mounting concerns about whether > their machines are secure enough to withstand tampering by hackers. -- Sincerely, Henry Schwan Paralegal Electronic Frontier Foundation - ISN is currently hosted by Attrition.org To unsubscribe email majordomo@private with 'unsubscribe isn' in the BODY of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 11 2003 - 03:47:18 PST