[ISN] REVIEW: "Information Security Risk Analysis", Thomas R. Peltier

From: InfoSec News (isn@private)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 03:57:47 PDT

  • Next message: InfoSec News: "[ISN] Akamai Attack Reveals Increased Sophistication"

    Forwarded from: "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah" <rslade@private>
    BKINSCRA.RVW   20040509
    "Information Security Risk Analysis", Thomas R. Peltier, 2001,
    %A   Thomas R. Peltier
    %C   920 Mercer Street, Windsor, ON   N9A 7C2
    %D   2001
    %G   0-8493-0880-1
    %I   Auerbach Publications
    %O   +1-800-950-1216 orders@private
    %O  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0849308801/robsladesinterne
    %O   http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/ASIN/0849308801/robsladesin03-20
    %P   281 p.
    %T   "Information Security Risk Analysis"
    Chapter one, supposedly discussing effective risk management, outlines
    a number of points important to the process, but in a rather scattered
    manner.  Material seems to have been gathered from a variety of
    sources, but the gaps between those references and articles have not
    been filled.  The information given is inconsistent in terms of
    significance: a list of natural threats lists "air pollution" (there
    is no corresponding "water pollution") and "earthquakes" as generic
    issues, but breaks weather conditions down into items as specific as
    "Alberta Clipper" and "lake effect snow" (as well as a very odd
    mention of "yellow snow," defined as snow coloured by pollen).  Risk
    analysis methods are generally divided into quantitative and
    qualitative, so one would assume that chapter two, "Qualitative Risk
    Analysis," would present the concepts of this idea, leaving
    quantitative analysis for another section.  Neither of those
    assumptions is true: chapter two lists three different methods that
    would probably be seen as qualitative, but does not analyse or compare
    them, and quantitative analysis is not reviewed in any specific part
    of the book.  Chapter three, entitled "Value Analysis," is an
    extremely terse mention of the importance of calculating the value of
    assets.  Five more qualitative procedures are listed in chapter four. 
    Another such, the Facilitated Risk Analysis Process (FRAP), suitable
    for a quick risk review in a small department, is described in chapter
    five, along with some related, but incompletely described, forms and
    charts.  "Other Uses of Qualitative Risk Analysis," in chapter six,
    enumerates a few other risk analysis factors, mostly to do with
    business impact analysis.  Chapter seven is supposed to be a case
    study using FRAP, but consists of fifty pages of unexplained forms. 
    The appendices contain various forms, again without commentary or
    exegesis, including a questionnaire that bears a strong resemblence to
    the US NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) security
    self-assessment form.
    The basics of risk analysis are here, but, aside from a padding of
    verbiage, there is not much else.  A decent article on the subject,
    such as Ozier's in the "Information Security Management Handbook" (cf.
    BKINSCMH.RVW), covers every bit as much territory, and in a more
    concise manner.
    copyright Robert M. Slade, 2004   BKINSCRA.RVW   20040509
    ======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
    rslade@private      slade@private      rslade@private
    There are no *printed* instructions, but I found a CD-ROM called
    `How to Set Up Your Computer.'                         - Dan Piraro
    http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev    or    http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade
    ISN mailing list
    Sponsored by: OSVDB.org - For 15 cents a day, you could help feed an InfoSec junkie!
    (Broke? Spend 15 minutes a day on the project!)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 22 2004 - 05:45:19 PDT