http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=IEMOBN5ZFAONYQSNDBCSKHQ?articleID=26100460 By TechWeb News InformationWeek July 28, 2004 Adding more fuel to the Linux vs. Windows fire, a research firm released a survey Wednesday that noted only 8% of Linux developers had ever seen a virus infect their systems. Evans Data, a research firm that regularly polls developers, surveyed 500 Linux developers. An overwhelming majority--92%--claimed that their machines had never been infected by malicious code, and fewer than 7% said that they'd been the victims of three of more hacker intrusions. Only 22% of Linux developers said that their systems had ever been hacked. A similar survey by Evans last spring found that nearly 60% of non-Linux developers admitted they'd been victimized by security breaches, and 32% had been hit three or more times. Does that mean Linux is a more secure operating system? Nicholas Petreley, Evans Data's Linux analyst, certainly thinks so. "It's not surprising that Linux systems aren't hacked to the degree that Windows-based machines can be exploited," he said in a statement. "The reasons for the greater inherent security of the Linux OS are simple: More eyes on the code means that less slips by and the OS is naturally going to be better secured." Another factoid from the July survey found that 76% of developers now believe that the SCO Group's ongoing lawsuits will "probably not" or "absolutely not" affect their company's adoption of the open-source operating system. That number is up 8% from when the question was last asked six months ago--a confirmation that SCO's sometimes-struggling legal battle isn't making much of an impression in the trenches. _________________________________________ Help InfoSec News with a donation: http://www.c4i.org/donation.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Jul 29 2004 - 01:13:02 PDT