http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004/1025/web-niap-10-27-04.asp By Rutrell Yasin Oct. 27, 2004 Officials at the National Information Assurance Partnership have effectively raised the level of security in many information technology products used by the government, the security group's director said today. The aim of NIAP, an initiative of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Security Agency, is to increase the level of trust users have in their information systems through the use of security testing, evaluation and validation programs. To that end, NIAP officials are responsible for implementing the Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme, a rigorous set of security tests that adhere to international standards. NIAP officials provide technical guidelines to eight commercial laboratories which conduct the tests. Statistics gleaned from the labs' Common Criteria work indicates that the testing is improving security, said Jean Schaffer, director of NIAP. Schaffer spoke during a session at a Federal Information Assurance Conference held this week at the University of Maryland. So far, 100 percent of the products evaluated have been approved, she said. The testing directly improved 30 percent of the products tested by eliminating security flaws that could have been exploited by attackers. About 40 percent of the products evaluated were improved by the addition or extension of security features, Schaffer said. Critics say Common Criteria testing costs too much and takes too long, but Schaffer argued that these claims are made by those who do not have firsthand knowledge about the testing. Feedback from the labs shows that testing for Evaluation Assurance Level (EAL) 2 — the minimum level of security, which includes products such as firewalls, intrusion-detection systems, routers and switches — costs $100,000 to $170,000 and takes four to six months. The highest level of security — EAL 4, which includes operating systems that support peer-to-peer communications — costs $300,000 to $750,000 and takes one year to two years. The time and cost is driven not so much by the process, but by the commercial market, she said. NIAP officials want to develop protection profiles for a range of environments, but they lack the resources. For now, they are focused on Defense Department and intelligence agencies, Schaffer said. NIAP officials also want to develop a curriculum that would help software developers better understand security design principles and apply them within the vendor community. The Common Criteria evaluation program continues to grow with 126 products in evaluation as of September 2004 compared with about 60 products at this time last year. "We're taking in six new products or more per month," she said. NIAP has an important role to play but is not the only player. There are some things Common Criteria does not address, such as testing software code that might have been developed in foreign countries, she said. _________________________________________ Open Source Vulnerability Database (OSVDB) Everything is Vulnerable - http://www.osvdb.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Oct 28 2004 - 07:15:45 PDT