[ISN] DHS seeks help investigating nuclear detection gaps

From: InfoSec News (alerts@private)
Date: Mon Mar 26 2007 - 22:56:09 PST


By Jon Fox
Global Security Newswire
March 26, 2007

The Homeland Security Department plans to enlist experts both inside and 
outside the government to launch a program probing the vulnerabilities 
of the nation's nuclear detection network.

The assessment would take place even as the United States continues to 
develop its radiation detection systems and looks to invest more than $1 
billion in next-generation detectors.

The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, a division within DHS, is hoping 
that by employing independent experts it can garner a glimpse of the 
current nuclear and radiological detection approach from a terrorist's 
perspective, according to a description of the plan posted to a 
government Web site last week.

These "Red Teaming Assessments" would be based solely on publicly 
available information in order to identify vulnerabilities a terrorist 
group might be able to locate with the same data.

The government's concern, which has grown astronomically since the 
terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, is that a group or individual could 
smuggle either radiological or nuclear material into the United States 
for use in a "dirty bomb" or an improvised atomic weapon. The Domestic 
Nuclear Detection Office, just more than 2 years old, was launched to 
specifically counter this threat.

"The goal is to identify vulnerabilities in the technology and 
operational procedures and to identify sensitive open-source information 
that, while unclassified, would prove useful to anyone attempting to 
circumvent the global nuclear detection architecture," according to the 
program description.

DHS is currently scanning 90 percent of inbound sea cargo at U.S. ports 
for radiation. The department expects that number to reach 98 percent 
for cargo at major domestic ports by the end of 2007. By 2008, nearly 
all containers at U.S. ports are set to be scanned for radiation, DHS 
officials have said. Radiation detectors are also being deployed at 
major land border crossings into the United States.

Industry, academic and government experts would study existing gaps in 
nuclear detection and those that could arise as the system develops, 
according to the detection office's request for input. They would be 
able to supplement data gleaned from open-source documents with 
"surveillance, site penetration" and any other information they might be 
able to independently elicit.

The efforts would result in both annual assessments and shorter-term 
studies that would gauge potential vulnerabilities and suggest fixes on 
a quarterly basis.

The nuclear detection office is asking experts over the next month 
provide suggestions on the structure of such a study group and the 
technological backgrounds of its members.

The DHS is also asking for input on ways the experts in the group could 
collect information, conduct surveillance and probe the security at 
sites legally and safely. Such activities could include simulated 
smuggling or actual transport of radiological or nuclear material, 
according to the DHS description of the planned program.

Unofficial tests of the system have shown weaknesses in the past. In 
2002 and again in 2003, ABC News packed 15 pounds of depleted uranium 
into a lead pipe and shipped it via sea container into the United States 
to test U.S. detection capabilities.

In effect, study group members might be asked to play terrorist, probing 
for information and physically testing the U.S. detection web. Homeland 
Security officials are looking for an "accurate emulation of potential 
threat actors, their likely source materials and courses of action," 
according to the DHS posting.

Red teaming, or employing government outsiders to play the role of 
adversaries, is a fairly regular exercise employed by U.S. agencies, 
said nuclear security expert Charles Ferguson, a fellow at the Council 
on Foreign Relations.

Several years ago, Ferguson was part of a red team that was called to 
consider how a terrorist group might launch a dirty bomb attack. During 
that exercise the government also tapped the imagination of author Brad 
Meltzer, a writer of popular thrillers set in Washington.

"I think it's a valuable exercise," Ferguson said. "It's a way to bring 
in outside experts and just poke holes in what the government is trying 
to do."

Jeffrey Lewis, director of the New America Foundation's Nuclear Strategy 
and Nonproliferation Initiative, disagrees, suggesting they are likely 
an ineffective way to predict real adversary responses.

"I just don't see any reason to assume that terrorists laboring under 
real operational constraints would reach the same conclusions as a 
predominantly white, male, sixty-something, upper-middle class panel 
dominated by Ivy League graduates chatting over pastries and coffee," 
said Lewis via e-mail. "Many of these individuals are brilliant, but 
none of them are terrorists."

The Domestic Nuclear Detection Office is testing three versions of a 
next-generation radiation detector that it hopes would be able to detect 
radiation and to identify the emitting isotope as harmless and naturally 
occurring or a material of concern such as highly enriched uranium.

Present detectors do not distinguish between radiation-emitting 
materials, requiring Customs and Border Protection officials to conduct 
secondary screenings with a handheld scanner to determine the source of 
the alert.

Lawmakers have questioned whether the new machines, which carry a total 
price tag of $1.2 billion, would serve to better protect the nation's 
borders. Funding has been put on hold until the detector's increased 
efficacy can be certified by DHS.

DHS officials say the next-generation technology would still be unable 
to detect shielded highly enriched uranium, what experts say would 
likely be the nuclear material of choice for a terror group trying to 
assemble a simple nuclear device. Highly enriched uranium emits a 
relatively weak nuclear signature.

Copyright 2007 by National Journal Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Visit the InfoSec News Security Bookstore

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Mar 26 2007 - 23:09:25 PST