http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/CYBER102109.xml By David A. Fulghum Aviation Week Oct 21, 2009 Although today's rudimentary non-kinetic weaponry can incapacitate a surface-to-air missile, radar, or even a tank, cyberwarriors still lack the tools necessary to determine right away if an attack has been effective. "There's no smoking hole," says a National Security Agency veteran. "It still looks like it can kill me." What's needed are major investments in technologies that "relate to how we couple intelligence analysis on a near, real-time or run-time basis in the battlespace," says John Osterholz, BAE Systems. vice president for integrated cyberwarfare and cybersecurity. "We're talking about very sophisticated intelligence analysis that provides support to the operators in the time it takes to run data through a computer," he said. "That's the operational art that needs to be written, generalized and normalized. There are technologies, training and doctrine associated with analysis of bomb damage assessment (BDA) that needs to see more emphasis." [...] ________________________________________ Did a friend send you this? From now on, be the first to find out! Subscribe to InfoSec News http://www.infosecnews.orgReceived on Fri Oct 23 2009 - 00:15:21 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 23 2009 - 00:59:46 PDT