http://www.csoonline.com/article/606263/3-areas-where-fud-needs-to-stop By Joan Goodchild Senior Editor CSO August 26, 2010 There is a new breed of animal appearing in the infosec community, according to Dr. Jimmy Blake, chief security officer for Mimecast, a cloud-services company based in London, and host of the blog Cloud Computing and Bad Behavior. The new breed is what he calls the "attention monger" (he actually used a more colorful word, but we toned it down for this article.) The attention monger is courting headlines with the media that add no real value to information security. Most infosec pros know the term FUD; it stands for Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. But increasingly Blake thinks he sees FUD making headlines too often because opportunists are hoping to get their name out there. However, while drumming up concern over vulnerabilities in popular products does often garner media attention, it can be detrimental, too, he warns (See also: Good FUD vs. bad: Is there really a difference?) [1]. "The danger in raising FUD is that users get attrition. They get so used to a constant stream of things that they are told to watch out for and when the really big things actually occur, they aren't ready for it," he said. "If we are constantly bombarding users with this stuff, it gets lost in the noise and they aren't prepared for the real vulnerabilities." Blake recently outlined three areas where he sees rampant hype spewed in the media with little value. [1] http://www.csoonline.com/article/485410/good-fud-vs.-bad-is-there-really-a-difference- [...] _______________________________________________________ Subscribe to InfoSec News - www.infosecnews.org http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isnReceived on Sun Aug 29 2010 - 22:35:56 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Aug 29 2010 - 22:44:01 PDT