December 7, 1997 VIEWPOINT / By EDWARD YARDENI Edward Yardeni is chief economist and managing director of Deutsche Morgan Grenfell North America. This article is based on his testimony last month at a Senate subcommittee hearing on the year 2000 problem. A Race Against the Calendar T he "year 2000" problem poses a serious threat that could disrupt the United States economy and bring about a yearlong global recession beginning in January 2000. Such a recession could be as severe as the 1973-74 global downturn that was caused by the OPEC oil embargo -- a useful analogy for the economic consequences of the current situation. ________________________________________________________________ The problem is time. All the money in the world will not stop Jan. 1, 2000, from arriving. There is not enough time to fix and test all the systems around the world that must be fixed. ________________________________________________________________ Information, just like oil, is a vital resource for our global economy. If the supply of information is allowed to be disrupted, many economic activities will be impaired, if not halted. The 2000 problem is both trivial and overwhelming. Unless fixed, most computers, including many PC's, will produce nonsensical results or crash because "00" in the widely used two-digit year field on the computer screen will be recognized as 1900 rather than 2000. Obviously, there are simple solutions. The two-digit fields, for example, can be replaced with four-digit fields. Or software can be programmed to recognize incoming years in a range, say between 0 and 40, as being in the 21st century. The problem is time. All the money in the world will not stop Jan. 1, 2000, from arriving. There is not enough time to fix and test all the systems around the world that must be fixed. A problem in one system could start a domino effect. A failure in one system could corrupt other systems. The problem will be a nonevent only if the global computer network is 100 percent fixed, and there is sufficient reason to believe that a significant fraction of the system will not be ready in time. Assessing the likelihood that the year 2000 problem will set off a recession as well as measuring its depth and duration requires answers from government and business managers around the world. They must provide much more information so that the public and policy makers can determine the risks ahead and prepare for a foreseeable and plausible worst-case outlook. All businesses, incorporated and unincorporated, should be required by new laws or regulations to disclose their cumulative and quarterly expenditures for fixing the year 2000 problem. They should also be required to outline best- and worst-case projections for such outlays. Most important, all businesses should be required to post progress reports on their efforts at least quarterly. They should be detailed and include this information: * Schedules for companywide progress, showing the projected and realized dates of the standard five stages of remediation: awareness, assessment, renovation, validation and implementation. * Progress schedules for all critical activities related to remediation. * Lists of business activities that are expected to be impaired or terminated as triage decisions are made before Jan. 1, 2000. * Discussion of the risks from outside vendors and customers that might not be compliant in time, including suppliers of electricity and telecommunications services. * Discussion of related legal issues, including anticipated expenses for litigation and liability. * Discussion of contingency plans if compliance is not achieved. Senator Robert F. Bennett, Republican of Utah and chairman of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Financial Services and Technology, introduced legislation last month to require publicly traded companies "to make specific disclosures in their initial offering statements and quarterly reports" on whether their computer systems will be able to operate after Jan. 1, 2000. I ndeed, publicly traded companies must be responsible for reporting on the year 2000 problem, just as they are for any other event that might have a material impact on their books. The 2000 problem, however, is a unique business risk that requires unique disclosure rules. It is a risk that will adversely affect all businesses, all vendors and all customers. It will harm even those who anticipated the problem long ago and expect to be ready for it but depend on others who may not be prepared. The interests of the public must be protected along with those of investors. Self-interested capitalism is not designed to handle a systemwide, global risk to collective well-being. The mandate of individual business managers is to protect the interests of their own entities. For competitive reasons, they are likely to reveal as little as possible about material risks to their businesses. But in this case, the public's need to know must prevail over the legitimate but parochial interests of businesses. It is time to level the disclosure playing field. If all companies not just those that are publicly traded are required to disclose their year 2000 activities and risks, none will be at a disadvantage. If we give this problem top priority, it is not too late to reduce the risk of computer failures. Full disclosure would focus public pressure on managements that are not addressing the problem appropriately. S uch disclosure would also help creditors assess the risk of earnings losses and even failures among their business borrowers who fail to comply. Of course, full disclosure might increase the chance of a credit crunch, as bankers refuse to lend to companies that are not likely to meet the deadline. But it is better to increase the risk for business borrowers now, so they will take the threat to their survival more seriously. Those that won't survive may decide sooner to seek acquirers that are really trying to bring their systems into compliance. The current disclosure system simply will not provide policy makers and the public with needed information in time to prepare for the worst possibly one of the longest and deepest recessions on record. Without additional information soon, more problems and greater hardship are inevitable. Conceivably though highly unlikely wider disclosure may even show that the economic risks are small and temporary. But with so much at stake, preparations must now begin in earnest. We need answers from our business community. Then we can prepare for the worst, and thereby realistically hope for the best. Copyright 1997 The New York Times Company
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:56:17 PDT