I can't help but think that none of this would do any good. How about Tempest, or Van-Eck by which they can view your screen from quite a distance. -----Original Message----- From: David Kennedy <76702.3557at_private> To: Blind.Copy.Receiverat_private <Blind.Copy.Receiverat_private> Date: Tuesday, December 30, 1997 3:52 AM Subject: Re(3): [IWAR] EURO world spy system (fwd) >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>Anonymizer could defeat the problem with Internet Explorer, >>provided IE doesn't insist on exchanging version information >>with Redmond. Even so, we'll have Anonymizer Dialup soon in >>several major U.S. cities. > >And we have your word that: > >a) you're not a full time NSA employee. >b) the NSA has not compromised the Anonymizer in some obscure way. > >I don't want to start a flame war. But the truly paranoid must consider >this. > Mixmaster reduces the vulnerability, but even that assumes that multiple >mixmaster sites have not been subverted by <insert the intel agency of your >choice, who was it the Men from U.N.C.L.E were fighting? here>. > >___________________ >Dave Kennedy CISSP >Protect what you connect >Look both ways before crossing the Net >National Computer Security Assoc >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 >Charset: noconv > >iQCVAwUBNKimZfGfiIQsciJtAQFKMQP/cITEqzMT111Yx9MITNZ95wMF29dDtH1W >qc7eSjUh9PUX2SgE5it4YfUE4pN+d1eICqBFVp8gvbK8xca2gs+BMiNi6/ZpXbMv >lcqPtP2A7PU/M18q43QIwAtqGx2SCyOcVGzrDphJowxKnHlg3fQ1LmGgbWRyaMUk >yyUHyPPtF+c= >=HjDe >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:58:54 PDT