[IWAR] US Govt response to terror threat

From: 7Pillars Partners (partnersat_private)
Date: Mon Apr 27 1998 - 10:17:53 PDT

  • Next message: 7Pillars Partners: "[IWAR] PRIVACY cruise ships, big brother"

    I have so many things I could say, but they all reduce to 'too little, too
    late.' --MW
    
    Posted at 8:59 a.m. PDT Monday, April 27, 1998 
       
    Feds review response to chemical attacks
    
       WASHINGTON (AP) -- Fearing the nation may not be prepared to handle a
       chemical weapons attack, the Clinton administration is conducting a
       review of the nation's readiness.
       
       Almost a year in the works, the report is expected to yield two new
       directives from President Clinton on enhancing the nation's ability to
       fend off chemical and biological weapons and computer attacks, and on
       responding swiftly if these occur, according to a White House official
       who spoke Sunday on condition of anonymity.
       
       The review addresses several ``transnational threats,'' including
       terrorism, international crime and attacks on critical infrastructure,
       the official said. The official would not say when Clinton might issue
       the directives.
       
       In Congress, the General Accounting Office has conducted a series of
       hearings and reports on the issue.
       
       Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri, ranking Democrat on the House National
       Security Committee, complained last week that fighting terrorists in
       America is not the responsibility of any single government agency.
       
       Skelton urged Congress Thursday to order the 43 agencies involved to
       develop government-wide priorities, create a chain of command and get
       training and equipment to local law enforcement agencies.
       
       ``There's a great uncertainty as to who's in charge, who coordinates it,
       who offers people to the scene and who works on preventing it,'' Skelton
       said. ``I think it's going to be a year before you have any answer.''
       
       His remarks came a day after Attorney General Janet Reno and FBI
       Director Louis J. Freeh told a Senate panel the administration is
       working on a new directive outlining federal roles for counterterrorism.
       It would replace the directive issued after the April 19, 1995, Oklahoma
       City bombing that killed 168 people and injured hundreds more.
       
       They gave no indication when it would be ready for Clinton's signature
       
       Freeh said he was resisting a suggestion within the administration to
       put the Secret Service -- instead of the FBI -- in charge of
       counterterrorism activities.
       
       The need to address terrorism has taken on a new urgency in light of
       several incidents, domestically and abroad, since Clinton took office in
       1993.
       
       In addition to the Oklahoma City bombing, six people were killed and
       1,000 injured in 1993 when a terrorist bomb blew up at the World Trade
       Center in New York.
       
       Concern swelled among U.S. officials in March 1995, when a Japanese cult
       carried out a lethal nerve gas attack on the subway in Tokyo, killing 12
       and injuring 5,000. Later that year, Iraq admitted having built a large
       arsenal of biological weapons -- and had been ready to use it four years
       earlier during the Gulf War.
       
       Freeh testified last week that a national stockpile of vaccines,
       antibiotics and antidotes might be created to save lives in the wake of
       a terrorist attack.
       
       The ongoing review also is analyzing the needs of cities as they come up
       with a chemical attack response plan. That research involves the
       Pentagon, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Public Health
       Service.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:08:10 PDT