[risks] Risks Digest 21.97

From: RISKS List Owner (riskoat_private)
Date: Wed Mar 20 2002 - 16:21:22 PST

  • Next message: RISKS List Owner: "[risks] Risks Digest 21.98"

    RISKS-LIST: Risks-Forum Digest  Wednesday 20 March 2002  Volume 21 : Issue 97
    
       FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks)
       ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy, Peter G. Neumann, moderator
    
    ***** See last item for further information, disclaimers, caveats, etc. *****
    This issue is archived at <URL:http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/21.97.html>
    and by anonymous ftp at ftp.sri.com, cd risks .
    
      Contents:
    Overcoming ICANN: Forging Better Paths for the Internet (PFIR)
    Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 19:21:02 -0800 (PST)
    From: PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility <pfirat_private>
    Subject: Overcoming ICANN: Forging Better Paths for the Internet
    
                                            David J. Farber
                                            Peter G. Neumann
                                            Lauren Weinstein
    
                                            March 18, 2002
    
                                            http://www.pfir.org/statements/icann
    
    Overcoming ICANN: Forging Better Paths for the Internet
    
    An Open Letter to the Global Internet Community
    
    
    Despite its best efforts, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
    Numbers (ICANN) has proven overall to be a failed experiment in Internet
    policy development, implementation, and management.  ICANN's lack of
    meaningful representation, and its continuing pattern of drastic and
    seemingly arbitrary structural and policy changes (among other
    shortcomings), have created an unstable and suspicion-ridden environment
    that is detrimental to the interests of the vast majority of Internet users
    around the world.  The resulting overly politicized situation not only
    threatens the stability of the Internet itself, but also invites drastic and
    undesirable interventions by a variety of vested interests.
    
    We will not in this document detail the range of specific problems and
    issues, which have become widely recognized and known.  Key aspects of the
    problems relating to the Internet and ICANN have been outlined in previous
    statements [1][2][3], along with a set of basic proposed Internet guiding
    principles [4].  The continuing rapid deterioration relating to ICANN and
    its impact on the Internet now forces us to recommend the following three
    actions.
    
    First, as an immediate temporary measure, all Internet policy, operational,
    and other Internet-related functions currently performed by ICANN should be
    transferred, as soon as practicable while maintaining continuity, to a
    different, already existing non-profit organization (or organizations) on a
    non-permanent, strictly stewardship basis.  One potential candidate we would
    suggest considering for this role would be the Internet Architecture Board
    (IAB), although there are a range of other possibilities of course.  The
    process to plan and begin a transfer of responsibilities from ICANN should
    be initiated immediately.
    
    Next, we recommend that an intensive, international study be started at
    once, with a mandate to propose detailed and meaningful paths for the
    Internet's development, operations, and management.  The goal of this study
    would be to help guide the formation of purpose-built representative
    organizations and policies that would be beneficial both to established
    Internet stakeholders and to the wide variety of organizations and
    individuals who are effectively disenfranchised in the current Internet
    policy environment.  This study should consider both short-term and
    long-term alternatives, and could potentially be conducted by the National
    Research Council (NRC) and related international organizations, among other
    possible frameworks.
    
    Our third recommended step would be for the results of this study to be
    carefully considered and, as deemed appropriate, to be implemented.
    Internet-related functions would be transferred from the temporary
    stewardship organization(s) to the entities developed from the study results.
    
    Time is definitely of the essence if a potential "meltdown" of Internet
    policies, functionalities, and operations in the near future is to be
    avoided.  There is in particular an immediate need to begin the process of
    depoliticizing the situation and providing opportunities for
    consensus building regarding the range of Internet issues.  Wide consensus
    has already been achieved on at least one key point -- even by ICANN's
    current president -- ICANN is seriously broken.  We agree, and we
    additionally assert that ICANN's history, structure, and behaviors strongly
    indicate that the most productive course would be for ICANN's role in
    Internet affairs to be discontinued.
    
    This is not to cast aspersions on the efforts of any individuals involved
    with ICANN in the past or present.  Rather, we feel that ICANN has failed as
    an organization, and that the amount of "bad blood" and institutional
    "baggage" it carries doom "reform" efforts within the organization itself to
    ineffectiveness at best.  We come to this conclusion reluctantly, since in
    the past we have considered that there might be an appropriate continuing
    role of some sort for ICANN.  Unfortunately, this is no longer possible.
    
    We do not have all of the answers regarding Internet issues -- nobody does.
    The proposals above are not presented as any kind of fait accompli, but
    rather as an attempt to stimulate recognition that the Internet is facing
    serious problems that are in need of serious solutions.  The search for
    solutions will be difficult, and will be a continuing effort that far
    transcends matters relating to ICANN.  But half-measures will no longer
    suffice, and the status quo (however it might be disguised or "spun") can no
    longer be tolerated.
    
    Some persons genuinely fear that alternatives to ICANN might lead to
    situations even worse than the current dysfunctional ICANN environment.
    That is indeed a non-zero probability, but the increasingly chaotic
    situation with ICANN makes degeneration a decided *likelihood* if ICANN
    remains involved with Internet matters.
    
    The day of reckoning is already upon us.  Work should begin immediately to
    define and implement collaborative processes that can provide hope of
    assuring that the Internet will be the best possible resource for the
    population of the entire world.  The risks in change are real, but the need
    for change and the possibilities for meaningful and beneficial progress are
    even greater.  If we do not take these steps, we may well be dooming the
    Internet to a future of mediocrity at best, or of decay, fragmentation,
    greed, and even worse outrages.
    
       [1] PFIR Statement on Internet Policies, Regulations, and Control
           http://www.pfir.org/statements/policies
    
       [2] PFIR Proposal for a Representative Global Internet Policy Organization
           http://www.pfir.org/statements/proposal
    
       [3] URIICA Announcement
           http://www.uriica.org/announcement
    
       [4] PFIR Declaration of Principles
           http://www.pfir.org/principles
    
    Sincerely,
    
    David J. Farber
    farberat_private
    Tel: +1 (610) 304-9127
    Member of the Board of Trustees EFF - http://www.eff.org
    Member of the Advisory Board -- EPIC - http://www.epic.org
    Member of the Advisory Board -- CDT - http://www.cdt.org
    Member of Board of Directors -- PFIR - http://www.pfir.org
    Co-Founder, URIICA - Union for Representative International Internet
                         Cooperation and Analysis - http://www.uriica.org
    Member of the Executive Committee USACM
    http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~farber
    
    Peter G. Neumann
    neumannat_private or neumannat_private or neumannat_private
    Tel: +1 (650) 859-2375
    Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
    Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org
    Co-Founder, URIICA - Union for Representative International Internet
                         Cooperation and Analysis - http://www.uriica.org
    Moderator, RISKS Forum - http://risks.org
    Chairman, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
    http://www.csl.sri.com/neumann
    
    Lauren Weinstein
    laurenat_private or laurenat_private or laurenat_private
    Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
    Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
    Co-Founder, Fact Squad - http://www.factsquad.org
    Co-Founder, URIICA - Union for Representative International Internet
                         Cooperation and Analysis - http://www.uriica.org
    Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com
    Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy
    
    (Affiliations shown for identification only.)
    
    ------------------------------
    
    Date: 12 Feb 2001 (LAST-MODIFIED)
    From: RISKS-requestat_private
    Subject: Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)
    
     The RISKS Forum is a MODERATED digest.  Its Usenet equivalent is comp.risks.
    => SUBSCRIPTIONS: PLEASE read RISKS as a newsgroup (comp.risks or equivalent)
     if possible and convenient for you.  Alternatively, via majordomo,
     send e-mail requests to <risks-requestat_private> with one-line body
       subscribe [OR unsubscribe]
     which requires your ANSWERing confirmation to majordomoat_private .
     [If E-mail address differs from FROM:  subscribe "other-address <x@y>" ;
     this requires PGN's intervention -- but hinders spamming subscriptions, etc.]
     Lower-case only in address may get around a confirmation match glitch.
       INFO     [for unabridged version of RISKS information]
     There seems to be an occasional glitch in the confirmation process, in which
     case send mail to RISKS with a suitable SUBJECT and we'll do it manually.
       .MIL users should contact <risks-requestat_private> (Dennis Rears).
       .UK users should contact <Lindsay.Marshallat_private>.
    => The INFO file (submissions, default disclaimers, archive sites,
     copyright policy, PRIVACY digests, etc.) is also obtainable from
     http://www.CSL.sri.com/risksinfo.html  ftp://www.CSL.sri.com/pub/risks.info
     The full info file will appear now and then in future issues.  *** All
     contributors are assumed to have read the full info file for guidelines. ***
    => SUBMISSIONS: to risksat_private with meaningful SUBJECT: line.
    => ARCHIVES are available: ftp://ftp.sri.com/risks or
     ftp ftp.sri.com<CR>login anonymous<CR>[YourNetAddress]<CR>cd risks
       [volume-summary issues are in risks-*.00]
       [back volumes have their own subdirectories, e.g., "cd 20" for volume 20]
     http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/VL.IS.html      [i.e., VoLume, ISsue].
       Lindsay Marshall has also added to the Newcastle catless site a
       palmtop version of the most recent RISKS issue and a WAP version that
       works for many but not all telephones: http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/w/r
     http://the.wiretapped.net/security/info/textfiles/risks-digest/ .
     http://www.planetmirror.com/pub/risks/ ftp://ftp.planetmirror.com/pub/risks/
    ==> PGN's comprehensive historical Illustrative Risks summary of one liners:
        http://www.csl.sri.com/illustrative.html for browsing,
        http://www.csl.sri.com/illustrative.pdf or .ps for printing
    
    ------------------------------
    
    End of RISKS-FORUM Digest 21.97
    ************************
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Mar 20 2002 - 17:39:56 PST