Re: man problem

From: fluffyat_private
Date: Fri Dec 26 1997 - 22:57:10 PST

  • Next message: Jonathon: "Re: your mail"

    On Wed, 24 Dec 1997, Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
    
    > I just noticed a problem with the man system (version 2.3.10) on my Linux
    
    I have man version 1.4j (from typing man -?) and it doesn't exhibit this
    problem.  It writes directly to var/catman and doesn't use /tmp for
    anything.
    
    > box: /usr/man contains the .gz'd man pages:
    <snip>
    > When I execute man, a temporary file containing the un-zipped manpage is
    > created in /tmp. The name of the tmp-file usually is "zman<PID>aaa",
    > e.g. "zman10849aaa". This can be exploited with a simple symlink attack:
    >
    > perl -e 'for($i=8000;$i<12000;$i++){`ln -s /root/.rhosts /tmp/zman${i}aaa`;}'
    >
    > So when root executes man here and the pid of the man process falls in the
    > range 8000-11999... you know the rest.
    
    In general passive attacks like this can be used to overwrite arbitrary
    files on the system by making symlinks if and only if root isn't paying
    attention to what he is doing.  I personally prefer the kernel patch which
    prevents users from making symlinks to files which they don't own.  It
    solves this and a host of other symlink problems.  I never yet found a
    reason not to do this.
    
    A much more serious problem is the symlink attack with sendmail, wherein
    bad guys can symlink /var/tmp/dead.letter to wherever they want and then
    cause sendmail to write a dead letter into it, typically containing
    something like 'r00t::0:0:r00t:/root:/bin/bash' :)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:37:34 PDT