Re: visible passwd bug in kdm ?

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (agulbraat_private)
Date: Fri Jan 02 1998 - 16:00:50 PST

  • Next message: Vikas Aggarwal: "Re: Crashing an XTACACS authentication server"

    "J. Sean Connell" <ankhat_private>
    > On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, Sascha Runschke wrote:
    >
    > > it seems that there is a bug in the login procedure of the kdm environment.
    > > If you type your passwd when prompted for it and afterwards try to mark the
    > > invisible passwd with the mouse, it suddenly becomes visible.
    > >
    > > I don't think it's that dangerous, but there might be a situation where you
    > > cannot end your login-sequence and someone else is able to access your
    > > station.
    > >
    > > I did not check the code yet, because I do not use kdm. But maybe
    > > I'll have a look later.
    >
    > I don't know about this exact problem, but there is a generic problem with
    > Qt in this regard:
    
    Which is almost certainly not the same problem.  I expect the KDE
    problem is a kdm-specific bug.
    
    > A text entry field that has been set to "password" mode
    > still permits selection (and therefore copying) of the plaintext contents.
    > I spoke with Arnt Gulbrandsen at Troll Tech about this after discovering it
    > myself while working on a nice GUI s/key calculator (email me if you're
    > interested). I can't remember what he said about why it was that way, but
    > after I pointed out that while under Windows inadvertent selection does not
    > cause copy, it *does* under X - which makes accidentally pasting your
    > password into the wrong window (or even having someone snoop it out of your
    > server - yeah, this is rather unrealistic ;) trivially easy. He concurred
    > and mumbled something about it being fixed in 1.4 or so.
    
    As I remember it, I committed the fix to our CVS archive on the same
    day that you convinced me:)
    
    > Please note that I have no connection with Troll Tech other than being a
    > personal friend of Arnt's, and that anything in the preceding paragraph
    > could be wrong.  Arnt, further comment from the proverbial horse's
    > mouth? (And please don't shoot me ;)
    
    Further comments would be off-topic on bugtraq, and niggles beside.
    
    --Arnt (just now back from vacation)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:38:08 PDT