Re: Another ld-linux.so problem

From: Solar Designer (solarat_private)
Date: Sat Feb 07 1998 - 17:39:40 PST

  • Next message: joost witteveen: "Re: Another ld-linux.so problem" 

    Hello,

> It's much simpler than that:
>
> $ LD_PRELOAD=libdoesntexist /bin/su
> /bin/su: error in loading shared libraries
> libdoesntexist: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

>   libraries that are installed on the system should be well written,
>   and it should be safe for them to be specified in LD_PRELOAD.
>
> I am quite surprised by this attitude, and I think I've thought of 3
> situations where this behaviour of the dynamic linkers may _possibly_
> create security problems.

Is there a reason for this limited LD_PRELOAD support for setuid binaries,
does something depend on it? It looks like this was done intentionally...

Anyway, here's a patch for ld-linux.so 1.9.5 that I just did:

--- boot1.c.orig        Mon Jul 21 16:45:35 1997
+++ boot1.c     Sat Feb  7 20:17:44 1998
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@
     else
     {
       _dl_secure = 1;
-      _dl_preload = _dl_getenv("LD_PRELOAD", envp);
+      _dl_unsetenv("LD_PRELOAD", envp);
       _dl_unsetenv("LD_AOUT_PRELOAD", envp);
       _dl_unsetenv("LD_LIBRARY_PATH", envp);
       _dl_unsetenv("LD_AOUT_LIBRARY_PATH", envp);

(This is only to fix the LD_PRELOAD problem, not the load-old-version one.)

Signed,
Solar Designer

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:42:05 PDT