Attack/DoS

From: Todd R. Stroup (tstroupat_private)
Date: Wed Jun 03 1998 - 14:52:52 PDT

  • Next message: David Wagner: "Re: CISCO PIX Vulnerability"

    Don't know if it is just me.  But over the last 10 hours we have been
    seeing attacks on port 0 from port 0 (both tcp and udp) on several clients
    networks.  I have also seen the same attack on port udp 53(DNS).
    
    Anyone have any information on this?
    
    
    Todd R. Stroup
    Fiber Network Solutions, Inc.
    
    
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 21:58:17 -0500
    > From: "J.A. Terranson" <sysadminat_private>
    > To: BUGTRAQat_private
    > Subject: (Admittedly Premature) Exploit (?) Warning.
    >
    > While I realize that this issue may not yet be "ripe", as I the folks involved
    > (myself and at least three other sites) have not yet firmly established just
    > *exactly* what is going on here, but...
    >
    > There appears to be some kind of exploit making the rounds that utilizes
    > TCP packets from port "0" (yes, that's *zero*) to the IMAP port, 143.  These
    > packet traces are right now available only as historical log entries that are
    > *loosely* associated with 2 successful "root" attacks against IMAP enabled
    > servers, an unsuccessful attack against another (ours), and the possible
    > compromise of another.
    >
    >         In short, I dont know a lot, other than in the course of reviewing my
    > daily logs, I saw a couple of freaky packets (above) addressed to my
    > nameservers (both of them).  They were rejected and logged at the routers,
    > however, as a common courtesy, we notified the admin of the "sending"
    > machine that they had a sick box.  As it developed, this person had
    > recieved other emails regarding this from other admins, 2 of which had
    > suffered the successful attacks mentioned above - all of us seeing the
    > originating machine as the same box.  It is unknown if the source address was spoofed.
    >
    >         Basically, I think this is just a "common-cause" warning to look out
    > for weird packets of this nature, and to take notice if you see any.
    >
    >         Rather than keep a running blow-by-blow going on the various lists,
    > please address anything regarding this to me directly...
    >
    > Thanks
    > J.A. Terranson
    > sysadminat_private
    >
    >
    >
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:56:42 PDT