I took a look at the BO detector, and I was surprised at how different it was from the one that I'd put together. Would it be possible for someone to reveiw the differences between the two and explain why one coding method is (better|more efficient|cleaner) than the other? Thanks, and keep up the good work! Jon > -----Original Message----- > From: Dr. Mudge [SMTP:mudgeat_private] > Sent: Friday, December 18, 1998 3:30 PM > To: bugtraqat_private > Cc: nfr-usersat_private > Subject: L0pht NFR N-Code Modules Updated > <snip> > Of particular note should be the Back Orifice detection module which we > feel is the best one available right now - it does not rely upon the weak > encryption in BO, it has fewer false positives than the commercial > products out there, it's free, and you get the source. > > The new modules are (all contributed by siliat_private) : > > . Back Orifice Detector > <snip> **************************************************************** TO POST A MESSAGE on this list, send it to nfr-usersat_private TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send the following text in the message body (not subject line) to majordomoat_private unsubscribe nfr-users your-email-address ****************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:27:27 PDT