Re: oshare testing

From: Aleph One (aleph1at_private)
Date: Thu Jan 28 1999 - 09:41:24 PST

  • Next message: Darren Rogers: "Compulink LaserFiche Client/Server - unencrypted passwords"

    A summary of the replies from people testing the oshare program against
    different versions of Windows:
    
    Reported Vulnerable  (Crash):
    
    Windows 95		Nicu Pavel <panicat_private>
    Windows 95		"C.J. Oster" <lordvadrat_private>
    Windows 95 + USB	kpavlovat_private
    Windows 95 OSR2		Nicu Pavel <panicat_private>
    Windows 95 Japanese	sen_mlat_private
    Windows 95 DK attack from Linux 2.2.0, 2.0.36 and SunOS 4.1.4		ninoat_private
    Windows 95 UK attack from Linux 2.2.0, 2.0.36 and SunOS 4.1.4		ninoat_private
    Windows 98		Nicu Pavel <panicat_private>
    Windows 98		maniacat_private
    Windows 98 Japanese	sen_mlat_private
    Windows 98 UK attack from Linux 2.2.0, 2.0.36 and SunOS 4.1.4		ninoat_private
    
    Reported Vulnerable (Frozen, no BSOD):
    
    Windows 98 4.10.1998 all windowsupdate patches.	Launched attack from Linux.	"Keith Warno" <keith.warnoat_private>
    
    Reported Vulnerable (Frozen until packets stop):
    
    Windows 98		"C.J. Oster" <lordvadrat_private>
    Windows 98		Vanja Hrustic <vanjaat_private>
    
    Reported Not Vulnerable:
    
    Windows 98 English		sen_mlat_private
    Windows 98 tested from Linux	tsdat_private	
    Window NT 4.0 SP3		maniacat_private
    Windows NT 4.0 SP4 Japanese	sen_mlat_private
    Linux 2.0.36			maniacat_private
    
    Someone also mentioned that Linux (2.0.36) replaces the ip total length
    field with 40, the actual ip-packet length (as seen by pcap).
    
    
    --
    Aleph One / aleph1at_private
    http://underground.org/
    KeyID 1024/948FD6B5
    Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61  8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:31:47 PDT