Re: NetBSD Security Advisory 1999-010

From: Ryan Russell (Ryan.Russellat_private)
Date: Sun May 23 1999 - 12:27:47 PDT

  • Next message: Cliff: "Re: Solaris libc exploit"

    >Talking of ARP, at least Linux has the problem that it blindly accepts
    >whatever hardware address it finds in the ARP response -- be it the
    >MAC broadcast address, or a multicast one. Not sure wheter other
    >OSs are affected.
    >
    >I didn't find anything dangerous you can do with this, unless there's
    >some really stupid IP stack that tries to forward IP packets that were
    >sent to the MAC broadcast--that would indeed be network meltdown. But
    >I haven't seen such a stack.
    
    I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "forward" in this case... whether
    you mean forward in the router sense, or whether you mean forward up
    the IP stack inside the box..
    
    In both cases.. I don't think it matters.  Nearly all IP stacks will accept
    frames sent to a broadcast MAC address.  That's how broadcast
    pings work.  If a Linux box can be tricked to think an IP address
    maps to the broadcast MAC address via ARP tricks, that could
    be really useful in a switched environment.  Doesn't break anything, either,
    until the network melts down with broadcasts.
    
                             Ryan
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:46:37 PDT