Re: Solaris libc exploit Re: Solaris libc exploit

From: Peter Harvey Solaris Sustaining Engineering (peter.harveyat_private)
Date: Wed May 26 1999 - 13:10:56 PDT

Next message: Peter Jeremy: "BUGTRAQ may be banned in Australia"

Previous message: Lucky Green: "ICSA certifies weak crypto as secure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ricky,

Excuse my not being clear enough here. A few people have already asked
me about this (to whom I replied individually).

> So 105210 doesn't fix the problem.

The patch I referred to does not fix the current exploit (you are
correct). I think perhaps you misunderstood my email. The bug 4118295 I
referred to is already fixed in the patch as I described.  This current
exploit is new.

I emailed BUGTRAQ to confirm:

	(a) bug 4118295 is different
	(b) bug 4118295 is already fixed
	(c) this exploit is new (and therefore *not* 4118295)

-- Peter

Next message: Peter Jeremy: "BUGTRAQ may be banned in Australia"
Previous message: Lucky Green: "ICSA certifies weak crypto as secure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:47:20 PDT