At 8:08 PM -0700 1999/8/28, Jethro Tull wrote: > All Dynamic DNS services that I know of are vulnerable . Known problem. DynDNS (as it exists today) is inherently insecure [0]. There are solutions to this problem underway, but they're not here yet. So, this is news to anyone? [0] Which I guess explains why Microsoft has chosen to use it in Windows 2000. ;-) -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ____________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, <blkat_private> Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, News & FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:00:53 PDT