Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in CDE

From: Nick_ (nickcat_private)
Date: Sun Oct 17 1999 - 10:57:57 PDT

  • Next message: Aleph One: "Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS99-043)"

    Searching the achives, I've not seen any reply to this, have these
    questions been answered yet?  In regards to Sun, is there a patch
    in the works, and if not how have other vendors fixed the problem?
    
    -Nick
    
    Date sent:      	Tue, 14 Sep 1999 18:53:23 -0400
    Send reply to:  	Dan Astoorian <djastat_private>
    From:           	Dan Astoorian <djastat_private>
    Subject:        	Re: Multiple vulnerabilities in CDE
    Originally to:  	BUGTRAQat_private
    To:             	BUGTRAQat_private
    
    > On Mon, 13 Sep 1999 23:46:53 EDT, "Troy A. Bollinger" writes:
    > >
    > > Here's the CERT advisory that was released today.  Of course, it's also
    > > available at www.cert.org.
    > >
    > [...]
    > >    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    > >
    > >    Vulnerability #1:
    > >
    > >           Systems running Solaris 7, 2.6, 2.5.1, 2.5, 2.4, and 2.3, and
    > >           SunOS 4.1.4 and 4.1.3_U1 are vulnerable if the UNIX
    > >           authentication mechanism (default) is used with ttsession.
    > >
    > >           The use of DES authentication is recommended to resolve this
    > >           issue. To set the authentication mechanism to DES, use the
    > [...]
    >
    > The way they've worded this very much makes it sound as though patches
    > are not forthcoming.
    >
    > Is this a design flaw, or an oversight in the implementation?
    >
    > If the former, why is it that other vendors (e.g. IBM) are releasing
    > patches claiming to fix the problem?  And, if the latter, is Sun
    > *really* saying "instead of fixing the problem, we're going to tell all
    > of our customers to use DES authentication, and if they can't or won't,
    > then to hell with them"?
    >
    > (Anyone know any decent references for setting up Secure RPC under
    > Solaris, particularly if NIS or NIS+ is not in use?)
    >
    > --                          People shouldn't think that it's better to have
    > Dan Astoorian               loved and lost than never loved at all.  It's
    > http://www.utopia.csas.com  not, it's better to have loved and won.  All
    > djastat_private       the other options really suck.    --Dan Redican
    >
    
    
    --
    Nicholas Crawford <nickat_private> / ICQ: 2555860 / Nick_ers@UnderNet IRC
    4096/1024 Diffie-Hellman/DSS PGP key ID: 0x738C4DB4 fingerprint:
         54DF 09EC D2A0 0942 2A4C  3CDD 3438 FF7B 738C 4DB4
    PGP keys via key server or http://paranoid.wolfspirit.org/~crawf/pgpkeys/
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:07:49 PDT