Re: F5 Networks Security Advisory (fwd)

From: pedwardat_private
Date: Wed Nov 10 1999 - 22:18:54 PST

  • Next message: Alfred Huger: "Re: FTGate vulnerability. (fwd)"

    I am upset about the recent thread about the Big/ip support account on Bugtraq.
    
    First of all, it's just stupid to sit here and say "They ship a product with
    a security hole, because it has a support password that is root priv'd".
    
    I have known about this for nearly 2 years, questioned them initially, but wrote
    it off as non-consequential.
    
    First of all, the default config is very restrictive, and they don't recommend
    the contrary.
    
    The Big/ip products ship with the F5 labs firewall IP COMMENTED OUT of the sshd
    config.
    
    They assured me that they rotate the passwords on a regular basis to ensure that
    accountability is retained internally.
    
    If the device shipped with a password that was obtained via a hex dump of a ROM,
    I could understand, but we're talking about a password that requires many hours
    of CPU time, or hundreds of thousands of dollars of hardware.
    
    I don't like good people like F5 getting grilled, and sending me a stupid advisory,
    because someone cried the equivelent of 'Y2K bug'.
    
    When will the discussion of real security threats, return to Bugtraq?
    
    Hey everybody, <insert fav dist> ships with a UID 0 account, it's password is probably
    guessable.
    
    Grr, this just makes me mad that we're discussing this.
    
    --Perry
    
    --
    Perry Harrington                 Director of                   zelur xuniL  ()
    perryat_private             System Architecture               Think Blue.  /\
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:11:13 PDT