So if you have a high system load it is okay to have some of the syslog messages lost? Hmm, I dunno, IMHO it is never okay, I mean why should you open up the opportunity at all. You know, security based on something being "not so prone to failure" doesn't exactly make me feel warm and cozy. On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Jefferson Ogata wrote: > I think it should be pointed out that datagram messages to a Unix domain socket > don't suffer the same network load losses that datagram messages across an > ethernet do. The quality of reception will generally be based purely on system > load, since an external network is not involved. You won't be losing lots of log > messages on account of a large file transfer between two other hosts. > > Therefore, I think reliance on datagram-based syslog to a Unix domain socket is > not so prone to failure as some other posters have implied. > > -- > Jefferson Ogata <jogataat_private> National Oceanographic Data Center > You can't step into the same river twice. -- Herakleitos > ========================================================================== --"the more you know and understand the more you must know and understand .. knowledge is an unsatiable hunger .. which makes life easier and at the same time harder .... knowledge is a paradox w/ no resolution just a boundless function of human nature .... knowledge is a trap which we embrace and which we run away from .... and in the end the only escape is death .... or maybe not "<grin>-- ========================================================================== -Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org- -This message transmitted on 100% recycled electrons- -Save the whales, Feed the hungry, Free the mallocs- Two cats on a roof, Which one falls off first? The one with the smaller mew.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:13:59 PDT