Re: local users can panic linux kernel (was: SuSE syslogdadvisory)

From: der Mouse (mouseat_private)
Date: Wed Nov 24 1999 - 09:53:28 PST

  • Next message: Paul Boyer: "Re: local users can panic linux kernel (was: SuSE syslogdadvisory)"

    > As long as syslog uses a connected socket (which it does), and
    > doesn't flag MSG_NOWAIT (which it doesn't), there isn't anything in
    > the kernel source that looks like the code will fail under
    > cpu/memory/whatever contention.
    
    That's *heavily* OS-dependent.  Not all implementations of AF_LOCAL
    sockets work the same.
    
    > Just because UDP datagrams are unreliable that doesn't mean that UNIX
    > datagrams are too.
    
    True.  But don't forget either that just because one implementation of
    AF_LOCAL actually is reliable doesn't mean that they all are.  (Though
    if AF_LOCAL sockets are reliable, they should be SOCK_RDM rather than
    SOCK_DGRAM, I think.)
    
    					der Mouse
    
    			       mouseat_private
    		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:14:11 PDT