Fwd: RE: Multiples Remotes DoS Attacks in MDaemon Server v2.8.5.0

From: Arvel Hathcock (Arvelat_private)
Date: Tue Nov 30 1999 - 14:17:23 PST

  • Next message: Ben Greenbaum: "Subst.exe carelessness (fwd)"

    Many thanks for providing me an opportunity to respond to the recent
    DoS issue reported to Bugtraq.  First, let me say that a hotfix
    for all our MDaemon/WorldClient Standard customers is available here:
    
    http://www.mdaemon.com/helpdesk/hotfix.htm
    
    and has been available since the very day the problem was brought to
    our attention (which was Thanksgiving day I think).  This hotfix is for
    MDaemon 2.8.5.0 and higher.
    
    A hotfix for WorldClient Pro is available here:
    
    http://www.worldclient.com/helpdesk/hotfix.cfm
    
    11/30/99 we will release full patches for both products.
    
    Another issue related to 350 simultaneous MDConfig connections has
    recently surfaced at ASCII Japan.  MDaemon can be configured to allow
    secure MDConfig connections which will prevent this problem from ever
    occurring.  This can be done now, however the 11/30/99 full patch will
    contain additional coding to prevent such a problem from occuring in
    the event that the system admin has left the port wide open for anyone
    to exploit.
    
    I am a strong supporter in what groups like Bugtraq and NTBugtraq are
    doing and I believe that freely sharing information on security issues
    is good for the consumer and good for the software industry as a
    whole.  However, I deplore the methods that 'USSRLabs' and others
    employ to this end.  Their statement that they have 'contacted the
    vendor' is patently false.  No one in our organization was contacted.
    I'm certain I speak for many software vendors when I say that groups
    like 'USSRLabs' are not really taken seriously.  Their practices seem
    to be motivated by a lust for self aggrandizement rather than a genuine
    interest in software quality.  The fact is, no one cares (or even
    remembers) who discovers a problem with some piece of software.  The
    only thing the consumer cares about is getting the problem fixed.  I'm
    proud to say that Alt-N has a reputation for quickly fixing any and all
    such problems and I'm very proud that over our 4 1/2 year history only
    two such problems (counting this one) have ever been discovered.
    
    In conclusion, we found out about this particular issue the same way
    everyone else did - via a mailing list post.  But that's ok with us
    because the relationship we have with our customers is such that we do
    not hide our mistakes from them.  We are not ashamed of problems
    because we don't consider ourselves to be gods who are above human
    error.  The relationship we have with our customers is not built upon
    a 'no mistakes' expectation.  Rather, it is founded on a history of
    providing solutions to problems, no matter how large or small, with a
    promptness that only small companies like ours can provide.  For the
    sake of our customers, not our reputation, it is unfortunate that we
    were not contacted earlier as the 'USSRLabs' report falsely claims to
    be the case.
    
    Arvel Hathcock
    Alt-N Technologies - http://www.altn.com
    ----------------------------------------
    MDaemon - http://www.mdaemon.com
    RelayFax - http://www.relayfax.com
    WorldClient - http://www.worldclient.com
    ----------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:15:11 PDT