AW: usual iploggers miss some variable stealth scans

From: Tobi (tklein2at_private-HEIDELBERG.DE)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2000 - 06:21:24 PST

  • Next message: Simple Nomad: "Re: usual iploggers miss some variable stealth scans"

    well, I tried your nmap-patch and must say that my scanlogd detects all of
    the stealth scans you mentioned in your posting.
    
    bye
    Tobi
    
    -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
    Von: Bugtraq List [mailto:BUGTRAQat_private]Im Auftrag von vecna
    Gesendet: Montag, 17. Januar 2000 20:26
    An: BUGTRAQat_private
    Betreff: usual iploggers miss some variable stealth scans
    
    
    in November`99 more or less... i've discovered 5 type of new stealth scan,
    with the modification of flags used normally on XMAS stealth scan.
    
    the five type of packets that can be used for stealth scanning, and isn't
    logged from the normal tcplogd/scanlogger have this flag:
    URG
    PUSH
    URG+FIN
    PUSH+FIN
    URG+PUSH
    
    this flag on packet, such FIN, XMAS (fin+urg+psh), and NULL scan (no one
    flag set) cause the reply RST+ACK if port is closed, and no reply if
    port is open. this is efective only against *nix system
    
    i don't think that is an important tecnical notice... but most tcp logger
    must be upgraded/reconfigurated.
    
    i've coded patch for nmap-2.12, check http://vecna.unix.kg
    
    Bye.
    vecna
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:28:51 PDT