Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3)

From: Todd R. Eigenschink (toddat_private)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 09:25:42 PDT

Next message: aleph1at_private: "Re: Messenger/Hotmail passwords at risk"

Previous message: Russ: "RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS?"
In reply to: Chris Adams: "Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3)"
Next in thread: bdoctor@ps-ax.com: "Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3)"
Next in thread: Ed Ravin: "Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Chris Adams writes:
>Better yet, have your POP daemon update the access file directly, and
>then you don't have any of the hokey "tail the log file" stuff going on
>at all.  All you need to add is a daemon to remove entries from the
>access file.

I have patches for qpopper 2.53 and 3.1.2 (and will be forward-porting
them to 4.0.3 this weekend) and the daemon to remove entries.  If
anyone's interested, mail me.


Todd
-- 
Todd R. Eigenschink             TEK Interactive Group, Inc.
toddat_private         http://www.tekinteractive.com/
System Administrator            (219) 459-2521

Next message: aleph1at_private: "Re: Messenger/Hotmail passwords at risk"
Previous message: Russ: "RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS?"
In reply to: Chris Adams: "Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3)"
Next in thread: bdoctor@ps-ax.com: "Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3)"
Next in thread: Ed Ravin: "Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 09 2001 - 15:50:18 PDT