<delurk> Hello all, Just wanted to provide y'all with some info. > > > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Acryl wrote: > > > > > Again the 3 files were created, but the Creation time/date was set > > > wrong, namely it was set to the very first creation time > ( before I > > > deleted them by hand ). Any following runs of the program > produced the > > > same results. > > > > This is known behavior. There is a window during which the "sticky" > > behavior will occur. In fact, certain MS apps (e.g. Word) > rely upon this > > behavior. > > Known to who? Is it documented anywhere? It's called file tunneling....... "The idea is to mimic the behavior DOS programs expect when they use the safe save method. They copy the modified data to a temporary file, delete the original and rename the temporary to the original. This should seem to be the original file when complete. Windows NT performs tunneling on both FAT and NTFS file systems to ensure long/short file names are retained when 16-bit applications perform this safe save operation. " It can also be disabled via the Registry so I'm pretty sure its a feature. > > Anyone involved in technical support or trouble shooting is likely to > have the MS technet documentation. Or access to the internet ;) http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q172/1/90.asp?LN=EN-US& SD=gn&FR=0&qry=ntfs%20and%20timestamp&rnk=1&src=DHCS_MSPSS_gn_SRCH&SPR=W IN2000 >On my CD, chapter 17 of > the "Windows > 2000 Professional System Configuration and Management", on > file systems, > has a section on NTFS file attributes, which look like an > obvious place > to start. Also a section on the Change log. But there is no indication > that "created" means anything different on NTFS than it did on FAT. I > haven't found it in 3 or 4 other likely looking documents. > > As it is, all sorts of questions follow from it. What is the window? By default it's 15 seconds > Where does NTFS store the information while the old file > doesn't exist? The notorious Windows-Temporary files > (Is it the change journal? It isn't mentioned.) What happens > to Word if > someone accidentally or deliberately breaks the mechanism? > > The behaviour is easy to replicate as described, and I can > also make it > happen from the command line without bothering with all that mouse > clicking. It sure looks like a bug or a vulnerability to me. > > Ken Brown > <relurk>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 16 2001 - 13:37:53 PDT