RE: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code]

From: Greg A. Woods (woodsat_private)
Date: Wed Jul 25 2001 - 18:08:27 PDT

  • Next message: John Marquart: "Re: Telnetd AYT overflow scanner"

    [ On Wednesday, July 25, 2001 at 20:27:51 (-0400), Eric D. Williams wrote: ]
    > Subject: RE: hacker copyrights was [RE: telnetd exploit code]
    >
    > With all do respect it is clear the case especially the Godwin ref. are not 
    > directly material to the issue / topic here but rather the application of the 
    > principles herein as you discussed.
    
    Well I see the Godwin article as primarily discussing whether or not
    crackers can get in trouble by publishing some document that they find
    through their (illegal) efforts, and as such only marginally applicable
    to the quite opposite question posed here.
    
    >  I am not clear on what your allusion to 
    > self-propagating worm is here, I believe this thread started where a question 
    > was asked whether a cracker would be protected from scrutiny by copyright.
    
    The question that opened this thread, IIRC, was asking whether or not
    someone publishing an analysis of a worm or virus would be violating the
    copyright of worm/virus author.  The original question also asked if the
    worm/virus code could be shared.
    
    Under normal circumstances, in at least many modern "Western" legal
    jurisdictions, copyright is implict and does not have to be registered
    to be valid.  This means that a virus/worm author has implicitly
    reserved all of their rights under copyright law even if they don't
    include any kind of copyright licensing notice.  So the original
    question was indeed partly on-track w.r.t. whether or not the worm/virus
    code could be shared.  While strictly speaking it's probably not legal
    to make more copies of the worm/virus code to share with other analysts,
    that doesn't mean you can't "show" your copy to them.  However as I've
    argued it would seem that due to the nature of worm/virus self-
    propagation the author must implictly relinquish his or her right to
    control redistribution, at least free redistribution, since nobody can
    prove one way or another how some second analyst might have obtained a
    copy of the code when all initial distribution is anonymous (and free).
    
    -- 
    							Greg A. Woods
    
    +1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <gwoodsat_private>     <woodsat_private>
    Planix, Inc. <woodsat_private>;   Secrets of the Weird <woodsat_private>
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 26 2001 - 15:33:26 PDT