Re: AW: IE https certificate attack

From: George Staikos (staikosat_private)
Date: Sun Jan 06 2002 - 09:11:14 PST

  • Next message: vps-support: "RE: Re : Fw: VERISIGN "PAYFLOW LINK" PAYMENT SERVICE SECURITY FAI LURE (#5947-000093-7546\939465)"

    On Thursday 03 January 2002 09:04, K.J.Muellerat_private wrote:
    
    > could it be, that the text-browsers (lynx, links, w3m) don't even
    > bother comparing the actual server name to the certificate's
    > "issued for" entry?
    
    > > Looks like Konqueror 2.2.1 (Mandrake Linux 8.1 + OpenSSL 0.9.6b) is also
    > > vulnerable. I've got no warning when entering on this page. I've tested
    > > it
    
      The https implementation in Konqueror is incomplete.  As of 2.2.2 it is 
    much more complete, although the code to test CN=hostname doesn't work 
    properly.  This is fixed in KDE 2.2 branch CVS and KDE 3.x HEAD branch.  KDE 
    3.0 should feature a more-or-less full HTTPS implementation finally.
    
        Most of the incomplete code and bugs in KDE SSL are documented anyways.
    
    -- 
    
    George Staikos
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jan 06 2002 - 23:44:42 PST