Re: Security side-effects of Word fields

From: Sean Smith (swsat_private)
Date: Tue Aug 27 2002 - 11:15:32 PDT

Next message: Ed Reed: "NOVL-2002-2961546 - SNMPv1 Trap and Request HandlingVulnerabilities"

Previous message: GooDWiN: "`admin' bug in upb"
Maybe in reply to: Alex Gantman: "Security side-effects of Word fields"
Next in thread: Kyle Duren: "Re: Security side-effects of Word fields"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) In-Reply-To: <20020826212322.1137.qmailat_private> We've looked at some similar issues for Word and other formats, and various PKI packages, in K. Kain, S.W. Smith, R. Asokan. ``Digital Signatures and Electronic Documents: A Cautionary Tale.'' Sixth IFIP Conference on Communications and Multimedia Security. September 2002. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~sws/papers/cms02.pdf --Sean

Next message: Ed Reed: "NOVL-2002-2961546 - SNMPv1 Trap and Request HandlingVulnerabilities"
Previous message: GooDWiN: "`admin' bug in upb"
Maybe in reply to: Alex Gantman: "Security side-effects of Word fields"
Next in thread: Kyle Duren: "Re: Security side-effects of Word fields"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 27 2002 - 12:39:25 PDT