RE: New trojan turns home PCs into porno Web site hosts

From: ge (geat_private)
Date: Fri Jul 11 2003 - 22:05:33 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Paget: "Re: iDEFENSE Security Advisory 07.11.03: Win32 Message Vulnerabilities Redux"

    > Some individual appears to have hijacked more than a 1,000 home
    computers starting in late June or early July and has been installing a
    new trojan horse
    > program on them.
    
    Let us consider ourselves lucky. That is an extremely low number.
    
    > To make it more difficult for these web sites to be shut down, a
    single home computer is used for only 10 minutes to host a site.  After
    10 minutes, the IP address of the Web site is changed to a different
    home 
    > computer.  The hacker is able to do this quick switching because he
    has installed DNS name servers for his domains on other home computers
    under his control.  The DNS name servers specify that a hostname 
    > to-IP-address mapping should only live for 10 minutes.
     
    As I see it, someone in the states should file a complaint with the FBI
    (if one has not already been charged) and they can handle this guy.
    If not, the best way, as I see, it is to check where the Trojan gets the
    information it uses from, a.k.a. where it connects. Should give you the
    right IP for abuse mail.
    If you get rid of that one IP, you effectively get rid of the thousand
    infected machines.
    
    > Some of the domain names used by the Web sites of the trojan are:
    >
    >    onlycoredomains.com
    >    pizdatohosting.com
    >    bigvolumesites.com
    >    wolrdofpisem.com
    >    arizonasiteslist.com
    >    nomorebullshitsite.com
    >    linkxxxsites.com
    
    Here's a place to start with the abuse mails, find out what ISP hosts
    them and cross your fingers they won't send your emails to /dev/null.
    
    > It is not known at the present time how the trojan gets installed on
    people's computers.  My theory is that the Sobig.e virus might be
    involved, but the evidence is not strong at the moment.
    
    The DSL and Cable IP ranges get scanned _even_ more than the rest of the
    world. Anybody remembers that paper that stated a computer would get
    scanned 36 hours after it establishes a connection to the Internet?
    Well, I am on ADSL with my home machine, and surprisingly enough I got
    hit the second I switched to ADSL and I get ten to fifteen scans a
    minute. That said not mentioning being a secondary victims to kiddies
    using these IP ranges to spoof attacks (ICMP echo 3).
    
    > Richard M. Smith
    > http://www.ComputerBytesMan.com
    
    
          Gadi (i.e. ge),
          geat_private
    
    --------
    gevronat_private
    PGP Key: 2048/2048 (Size) 0x2D3D6741 (ID).
    Fingerprint: 0EB3 00BC 974B 3C2B 336D 6486 ECA5 2D0D 2D3D 6741.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jul 12 2003 - 16:09:40 PDT