My question then is.... When PacifiCorp is signing up for InfraGard, and beginning to attend the meetings, are we actually part of the formal InfraGard or are we just informal via C.R.I.M.E.? When we go for clearance via the secure or non-secure authorization forms are we actually going through the national InfraGard process or just getting on the C.R.I.M.E. list for emails? Who is directly responsible for ensuring that the PDX InfraGard process is setup and fully functional? I will need to provide our management with the 'as it is today' picture so I do not mis-represent what we are trying to accomplish via InfraGard. Thanks. Chris Shepherd PacifiCorp -----Original Message----- From: Zot O'Connor [mailto:zot@private] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 6:28 PM To: benj@private Cc: C. R. I. M. E. List (E-mail) Subject: RE: DENUNCIA, crime , ESTAMOS SENDO PREJUDICADOS The crime list is merely the discussion list for the C.R.I.M.E. group which is now also the InfraGard Group. Most InfraGard groups are still figuring out dues/charters/meetings etc. C.R.I.M.E. does not exist as an entity and therefore does not suffer from those issues. There is a mailing list associated with the InfraGard sign up, but I have not received anything as of yet from them, except a monthly reminder that I am on there. The reminder points to a web site that does not respond. George forwards the email from the NIPC to this list. I assume things are still being setup in Washington DC...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun May 26 2002 - 11:26:57 PDT