On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 13:23, Jeme A Brelin wrote: > > On 7 Mar 2002, Russell Senior wrote: > > One of Zot's points that I particularly think might be valid is that > > this kind of volunteer involvement is essentially a backdoor way of > > possibly getting a form of civilian oversight of police activity... > > unless the volunteers are selected for their uncritical pro-police > > attitudes. > > I think this is how it's done, though indirectly. They want folks who are > cooperative and provide what they ask without questions. And if you > refuse, they'll find someone else to do the job. > This is mostly true. Lets face it, if all you do is argue with them, then you are not doing the job asked for. There are forums for that (perhaps not good ones). There are also background checks and what not. These are filters. That's why I want people to come to the meeting to bring this up. -- Zot O'Connor http://www.ZotConsulting.com http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun May 26 2002 - 11:39:13 PDT