RE: CRIME EarthLink Password Security Story

From: SCRIMSHER,JOHN (HP-Corvallis,ex1) (john_scrimsher@private)
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 15:27:21 PDT

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: CRIME Netcraft Ethics"

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jordan Gackowski [mailto:jgackowski@private] 
    > Using a method to access data that you normally wouldn't be 
    > able to access (such at the dir x-versal you mention) would 
    > (should) still be illegal. Like taking the money out of a 
    > cash register and using the excuse that it had a crappy lock 
    > so it was OK to get in there.
    > 
    
    Actually, a more appropriate analogy would be if a person were to enter a
    store and notice a door at the back with no signs on it and unlocked.. Being
    curious, they open the door to look in to find whatever is there... Could be
    a bathroom, storage closet, or vault... The person doesn't know until they
    look into it.  If they then walk back out, without taking and/or vandalizing
    anything that they found, other than the knowledge of what they saw, are
    they acting illegally?
    
    Your analogy of stealing the cash from an improperly secured register goes
    back to one of my main statements that theft or destruction is/should be
    illegal regardless of access methodology.
    
    John
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 16:22:56 PDT