Shaun Savage writes: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > The problem that I see is the the public workstation is "not secure" > ~ and having the community carry "secure eletronic ID" would cost too > much to impliment. This would rule out public key systems, so the > login ID and password is the best for this semi secure enviroment. I > would like a system that has fine grain Access Control per user. > I was thinking about using kerberos different services for the access > control. A "secure electronic ID" could be nothing more than a floppy with your private key on it, encrypted with a symmetric key based on a long passphrase. I know people who do this with their PGP keys... t
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 18 2002 - 13:07:48 PDT