My data set is not valid (yet). It's from an experimental implementation which is in parallel with four other machines which don't scan for viruses. Eventually we'll have it running on all of them. Routing of the mail is up to the load leveller and is not evenly distributed. - Tim On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 13:13, Kuo, Jimmy wrote: > Any chance, if you have these automated to send stats to you, that it could > be also sent to me? > > I love collecting this type of data. > > One of the things regular AV Researchers miss is that we only hear about the > problems we have. So, if it's addressed by the product, we don't hear about > it as much. And though I have access to two ISPs, it's nice to also see > other data, especially smaller. You can tell me not to forward, or whatever > restrictions... > > Thanks for the consideration. > > Jimmy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Kramer [mailto:kramert@private] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:00 AM > To: Alan > Cc: crime@private > Subject: Re: CRIME Sircam making a comeback > > > I didn't think it left. I see about 3/week. For that > matter, Magistr "a" and "b" are still around. I see about > 10 and 5 per week of those, respectively. > > - Tim > > On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 18:21, Alan wrote: > > Seems the Sircam virus is not dead, just resting. > > > > I have received two copies of it today. I had not seen a copy for a > > couple of months.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 06:27:09 PDT