CRIME FW: [Cyber_threats] Daily News 01/08/03

From: George Heuston (GeorgeH@private)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 17:50:29 PST

  • Next message: Zot O'Connor: "RE: CRIME Microsoft Windows XP question"

    -----Original Message-----
    From: NIPC Watch [mailto:nipc.watch@private] 
    Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:40 PM
    To: Information Technology; Cyber Threats
    Subject: [Cyber_threats] Daily News 01/08/03
    
    
    January 07, Associated Press
    Revised White House security initiative focuses on agencies. An internal
    draft of the Bush administration's revised plan to improve
    cybersecurity, the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, is
    circulating among government offices and industry executives this week.
    In the new plan, the number of initiatives to tighten security for vital
    computer networks was reduced from 86 to 49. The plan no longer includes
    a number of voluntary proposals for America's corporations to improve
    security, focusing instead on suggestions for U.S. government agencies,
    such as a broad new study assessing risks. Among the draft's changes was
    the removal of an explicit recommendation for the White House to consult
    regularly with privacy advocates and other experts about how civil
    liberties might be affected by proposals to improve Internet security.
    The draft notes that the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will
    include a privacy officer to ensure that monitoring the Internet for
    attacks would balance privacy and civil liberties concerns. The draft
    proposes to use the DHS to launch some test attacks against civilian
    U.S. agencies and to improve the safety of automated systems that
    operate the nation's water, chemical and electrical networks. The new
    version also says the Defense Department can wage "cyber warfare" if the
    nation is attacked. It warns that although it can be difficult or even
    impossible to trace an attack's source, the government's response "need
    not be limited to criminal prosecution." The new version also puts new
    responsibilities on the CIA and FBI to disrupt other countries' use of
    computer tactics to collect intelligence on government agencies,
    companies and universities. Source:
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18662-2003Jan6.html
    
    January 07, InfoWorld
    MSN Messenger outage affects millions. Microsoft Corporation's MSN
    Messenger service went down yesterday. According to a Microsoft
    spokesman, the service went down at approximately 9 a.m. EST, and the
    root cause of the outage is still unknown. The outage affected all 75
    million worldwide users of Microsoft's .Net Messenger Service, including
    Windows Messenger and MSN Messenger subscribers, according to a
    statement from Larry Grothaus, lead product manager for MSN. The .Net
    Messenger Service is the back-end service that powers both the Windows
    Messenger and the MSN Messenger clients. MSN Hotmail e-mail service and
    other MSN services weren't affected, he said. Although service was
    restored for some users by about 2 p.m. EST, some users were still
    unable to log onto the messaging software later in the afternoon.
    Microsoft didn't have any more difficulties with the service late
    yesterday, but some users may still be shut out as the service scales
    back up, according to Grothaus. Source:
    http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/software/groupware/st
    ory/0,10801,77308,00.html
    
    January 06, CNET News
    FCC considers changes to the broadband market. U.S. regulators plan to
    unveil a major overhaul in telecommunications policy in the coming weeks
    that could strengthen the hand of local phone monopolies in a number of
    key areas, including high-speed Internet access. At stake are
    regulations governing how local phone companies must treat competitors
    seeking access to their lines and facilities. Those rules, set in 1996,
    were intended to be the cornerstone of a competitive marketplace for
    services that piggyback on the local phone networks. But some top
    policy-makers at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have
    recently indicated that they believe consumers would do better if such
    rules were sharply curtailed. Small companies are worried about being
    driven out of business, companies as large as ATTare concerned about
    losing access to local phone networks, and the big local phone companies
    see a policy victory they've sought for years. At stake is control over
    the future broadband networks and services, and by extension the range
    of services choices that will be available to consumers and businesses
    in any given market. Since 1996's telecommunications deregulation,
    market competition has been fierce among cable companies, local phone
    giants, and a slew of rivals ranging from Covad to ATTthat use the local
    phone companies' networks for their own services. Source:
    http://news.com.com/2100-1033-979356.html
    
    January 06, Security Focus
    California disclosure law has national reach. A new California law
    requiring companies to notify their customers of computer security
    breaches applies to any online business that counts Californians as
    customers, even if the company isn't based in the Golden State. So
    warned Scott Pink, deputy chair of the American Bar Association's
    Cybersecurity Task Force, in a conference call Monday organized by an
    industry trade group, Information Technology Association of America, and
    attended by approximately 50 representatives of technology companies and
    law firms. The law, called "SB 1386," is intended to combat identity
    theft. It was passed last September and will take effect on July 1,
    2003. To trigger the law, a breach must expose certain type of
    information: specifically, customers' names in association with their
    social security number, driver's license number, or a credit card or
    bank account number. After such an intrusion, the company must notify
    the effected customers in "the most expedient time possible and without
    unreasonable delay." The disclosure only needs to be made to California
    residents. But as a practical matter, Pink said, online businesses may
    find it easier to notify everyone impacted by a breach, rather than
    trying to cherry-pick Californians for special treatment. Companies that
    ignore the law face potential exposure to class action lawsuits. The law
    addresses a chronic problem in e-commerce - companies that are hacked
    are often reluctant to go public for fear of bad publicity or civil
    liability. But in forcing companies to come clean, the California law
    takes the opposite approach of the Bush administration's emerging cyber
    security policies, which encourage secret disclosure to government
    officials, rather than public warnings.
    Source: http://online.securityfocus.com/news/1984
    
    Virus: #1 Virus in USA: PE_FUNLOVE.4099
    Source: http://wtc.trendmicro.com/wtc/wmap.html, Trend World Micro Virus
    Tracking Center [Infected Computers, North America, Past 24 hours, #1 in
    United States]
    
    Top 10 Target Ports: 137 (netbios-ns), 1433 (ms-sql-s), 80 (http), 445
    (microsoft-ds), 139 (netbios-ssn), 4662 (???), 135 (???), 25 (smtp), 53
    (domain), 443 (https)
    Source: http://isc.incidents.org/top10.html; Internet Storm Center
    
    _______________________________________________
    Cyber_Threats mailing list
    Cyber_Threats@listserv
    http://listserv.infragard.org/mailman/listinfo/cyber_threats
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jan 08 2003 - 18:41:09 PST