Re: CRIME Electronic Voting Security

From: John McHugh (jmchugh@private)
Date: Fri Sep 12 2003 - 06:15:47 PDT

  • Next message: Marc Schuette: "Re: CRIME Electronic Voting Security"

    Its been a while since I looked at the Secretary of State's Handbook
    on the Oregon mail voting system
    (http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/Publications/vote.pdf), but it
    seems to me that adding a return reciept mechanism would be a trivial
    electronic exercise.  The handbook requires that the outer envelopes
    be kept as a "poll record", serving a similar function to the polling
    book I sign each time I vote in PA.  This record is open to public
    inspection (who voted is not a secret) and any voter may request a
    confirmation that his vote arrived and was processed.  Using a bar
    code on the outer envelope and including a "reciept" card with the
    decoded number would allow the scanned codes to be automagically
    recorded when the outer envelope is processed and anyone could get
    confirmation by entering their reciept number on the web.  
    
    If any group suspects the kind of frauds suggested (loosing ballots on
    the way to the count), it is possible, even now, to get a sufficiently
    large group of people who voted to ask for confirmation.  Since the
    records are public, an individual need only compile a list of people
    who claim to have voted and confirm them.
    
    John
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Sep 12 2003 - 06:52:11 PDT