Open Source Computer Forensics Initiative Survey
The purpose of this survey is to determine if there exists a need for an
Open Source methodology manual or standard operating procedures on Computer
Forensics and what is the content and form the community would desire in
such a resource.
Please email me your feedback before the end of this week, I'll be posting
to the list the results on Monday 12th.
Don't panic, there are very few questions, the only goal is to see if there
is a need and desire to create such a resource, it will take you less than 2
minutes :)
1) Do you feel there is a need for an Open Source Methodology Manual for
Computer Forensics? [Y/N]:
2) Do you feel such a standard already exists? [Y/N]:
If [YES] please provide information on it:
Name: ___________________
URL: ___________________
*If [NO] what do you think is missing to any of the available resources?
(That is, what pitfalls you feel we should avoid in this project)
Individual initiatives, not developed by the community [Y/N]:
Not truly Open, no GNU License [Y/N]:
Not used by enough people to accept it as a standard [Y/N]:
Not subject to a formal peer review process inside the community [Y/N]:
Not kept up-to-date [Y/N]:
Not enough detail, very abstract or merely "Principles" (ex. G8) [Y/N]:
*Any other insight as to what has gone wrong with other initiatives:
___________
3) Do you feel there is a need for an Open Source Standard Operating
Procedures Manual for computer forensics? [Y/N]:
4) Do you feel such a standard already exists? [Y/N]:
If [YES] please provide information on it:
Name: ___________________
URL: ___________________
*If [NO] what do you think is missing to any of the available resources?
(That is, what pitfalls you feel we should avoid in this project)
Individual initiatives, not developed by the community [Y/N]:
Not truly Open, no GNU License [Y/N]:
Not used by enough people to accept it as a standard [Y/N]:
Not subject to a formal peer review process inside the community [Y/N]:
Not kept up-to-date [Y/N]:
Not enough detail provided [Y/N]:
*Any other insight as to what has gone wrong with other initiatives:
___________
5) Do you think that we should adopt one of the existing methodologies and
from that base develop appropriate Standard Operating Procedures? [Y/N]:
*If [YES] which methodology you believe should be considered?:
____________
6) Do you think such a resource should also include technical procedures
[Y/N]:
*If [YES] please provide more detail:
Technical Procedures should be developed once the general methodology and
non technical procedures/protocols are ready [Y/N]:
Technical Procedures should be separated from methodology and
non-technical procedures/protocols [Y/N]:
7) Do you feel the effort should be made to provide simpler methodology and
procedures for non-liturgical forensics scenarios? [Y/N]:
8) Other comments you deem necessary regarding the creation of an open
source reference for computer forensics: _________________
Thank you in advance for your feedback and watch out for the aggregate
results which will be posted to this list,
Matías Bevilacqua Trabado
CYBEX
___________________________________________________________________
PGP-ID: 0x40A4869F
PGP Fingerprint: 2052 98A0 F0F0 2914 D7FA 4E7C 0488 7E8C 40A4 869F
___________________________________________________________________
CYBEX
Grupo Intelligence Bureau
Rambla de Catalunya, 32 4º-2ª
08007 Barcelona
Tel. 93 215 53 23
Fax. 93 215 50 72
http://www.cybex.info
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 05 2003 - 08:32:26 PDT