Re: Q on external router

From: Bennett Todd (betat_private)
Date: Thu Apr 23 1998 - 04:01:52 PDT

  • Next message: Randy Witlicki: "Re: Q on external router"

    1998-04-23-06:34:58 Vinci Chou:
    > However, because these DMZ hosts are on the same phsical segment, even
    > they have different net numbers, a compromised host is still able to sniff
    > the traffic, isn't it ?
    
    That's exactly right. That's why I said, in my first note, ``only losing
    protection if a DMZ host is root-level compromised''.
    
    Now if you can't afford to have a multiport router, or N network
    interfaces on your bastion, then the cheaper solution that
    you're stuck with is a hub, and you lose root on a machine on a
    hub and all your traffic can be sniffed, always. But with the
    separate-nets-over-the-same-ether trick you can get some good
    additional protection _until_ one of the DMZ hosts gets root
    broken. Don't get root broken on machines in the DMZ, that's always
    sound advice.
    
    -Bennett
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 12:56:28 PDT